| Literature DB >> 27109346 |
E H Hart1, L A Onime1, T E Davies1, R M Morphew1, A H Kingston-Smith2.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Increasing the rumen-stable protein content of feed would lead to improved nitrogen utilisation in cattle, and less nitrogenous waste. Red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) is a high protein ruminant feed containing high polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity. PPO mediated protein-quinone binding has been linked to protecting plant proteins from proteolysis. To explore the mechanism underlying the effect of PPO on protein protection in fresh forage feeds, proteomic components of feed down-boli produced from wild-type red clover and a low PPO mutant, at point of ingestion and after 4h in vitro incubation with rumen inoculum were analysed. Significant differences in proteomic profiles between wild-type and mutant red clover were determined after 4h incubation, with over 50% less spots in mutant than wild-type proteomes, indicating decreased proteolysis in the latter. Protein identifications revealed preferentially retained proteins localised within the chloroplast, suggesting that PPO mediated protection in the wild-type operates due to the proximity of target proteins to the enzyme and substrates, either diffusing into this compartment from the vacuole or are present in the chloroplast. This increased understanding of protein targets of PPO indicates that wider exploitation of the trait could contribute to increased protein use efficiency in grazing cattle. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: One of the main challenges for sustainable livestock farming is improving capture of dietary nitrogen by ruminants. Typically up to 70% of ingested protein-N is excreted representing a loss of productivity potential and a serious environmental problem in terms of nitrogenous pollution of lands and water. Identification of key characteristics of rumen-protected protein will deliver target traits for selection in forage breeding programmes. The chloroplastic enzyme PPO catalyzes the oxidation of phenols to quinones, which react with protein. Little is currently known about the intracellular protein targets of the products of PPO activity or the mechanism underlying protein complexing, including whether there is any specificity to the reaction. Here we have determined significant differences in the proteomes of freshly ingested down boli corresponding to the presence or absence of active PPO. These results show that in the presence of PPO the forage protein is less amenable to proteolysis and provide the novel information that the protected proteins are putatively chloroplastically located. These data also contribute to a growing evidence base that a chloroplastic PPO substrate exists in red clover in addition to the currently known vacuolar substrates.Entities:
Keywords: Chloroplast; PPO; Polyphenol oxidase; Protein complexing; Red clover; Rumen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27109346 PMCID: PMC4881418 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.04.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Proteomics ISSN: 1874-3919 Impact factor: 4.044
Fig. 1Diagrammatic representation of the collection and in vitro incubation of feed down boli.
Fig. 2PPO activity (units/g Fw) in boli from wild-type and mutant genotypes at 0 h and after 4 h incubation. Significant differences in PPO activity are denoted by ** where P < 0.01, non-significant differences are shown as NS between bars.
Fig. 3Average total protein (nitrogen) content of boli from wild-type and mutant genotypes at 0 h and after 4 h incubation.
Fig. 4Proteomic profiles of boli formed from wild type and mutant red clover at 0 h and after 4 h incubation. Gels were run on 3–10 non-linear IPG strips, 14% T, 3.3% C SDS-PAGE. Gel images represent gel averages from three biological replicates. Gel A = wild type at 0 h, Gel B = mutant at 0 h, Gel C = wild type at 4 h, Gel D = mutant at 4 h. Circled spots indicate those excised for mass spectrometry.
Fig. 5Montage images for wild type 0 and 4 h (WT0, WT4) and mutant 0 and 4 h (M0, M4) average gels and corresponding normalised volume graphs for the top 15 protein spots showing the greatest difference in spot normalisation volume between wild-type and mutant proteomes. Images and graphs for each spot are separated into boxes A and B based on the cellular location of each protein from putative identifications (Fig. 4, Table 1).
Spot numbers corresponding to excised spots from gels (Fig. 4) showing normalised spot volumes for the mutant at 0 h (0 M), wild-type and 4 h (4WT) and mutant at 4 h (4 M) compared to the wild type at 0 h. Putative identifications of each spot and corresponding protein locations for each identification are shown together with the accession number and Mascot score. Spots not present (np) are indicated.
| Spot no. | Description | Accession | Species | Location | Mascot score | Abundance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 M | 4WT | 4 M | ||||||
| 1 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain | RBL_BYRCR | Chloroplast | 481 | 2686.8 | 2368.2 | 350.8 | |
| 2 | Malate dehydrogenase | MDH_PSEM | Mitochondria | 156 | 271.1 | 546.1 | 604.6 | |
| 3 | Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 1 | PSBO_PEA | Chloroplast | 415 | 1377.4 | 1180.8 | 214.9 | |
| 4 | Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2 | PSBP_PEA | Chloroplast | 83 | 1106.3 | 850.4 | 314.5 | |
| 5 | Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 215 | CB215_PEA | Chloroplast | 137 | 711.4 | 481.4 | 193.0 | |
| 6 | ATP synthase subunit beta | ATPB_HYANO | Chloroplast | 350 | 656.6 | 813.1 | 652.3 | |
| 7 | ATP synthase subunit beta-2 | ATPBN_ARATH | Mitochondria | 141 | 397.6 | 506.2 | 293.3 | |
| 8 | ATP synthase subunit alpha | ATPA_BUXMI | Chloroplast | 214 | 455.2 | 358.8 | 588.9 | |
| 9 | ATP synthase subunit alpha | ATPA_BUXMI | Chloroplast | 163 | 283.2 | 313.1 | 113.7 | |
| 10 | Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 8 | CB28_PEA | Chloroplast | 155 | 319.9 | np | np | |
| 11 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase A | G3PA_PEA | Chloroplast | 63 | 400.6 | 344.7 | 136.3 | |
| 12 | Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein | PSBP_WHEAT | Chloroplast | 231 | np 4441.1 np | |||
| 13 | Chlorophyll a-b binding protein | CB23_ORYSI | Chloroplast | 72 | 526.7 | 318.7 | 221.5 | |
| 14 | 50s Ribosomal protein L12 | RK12_ORYSJ | Chloroplast | 216 | 279.4 | 775.2 | 501.2 | |
| 15 | Triosephosphate isomerase | TPIC_SECCE | Chloroplast | 84 | 374.3 | 354.5 | 82.2 | |
| 16 | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase | ALFC_ORYSJ | Chloroplast | 360 | 152.4 | 174.1 | 291.7 | |
| 17 | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase | ALFC_ORYSJ | Chloroplast | 345 | 125.3 | np | np | |
| 18 | ATP synthase subunit alpha | ATPA_LOLPR | Chloroplast | 643 | np | np | 527.8 | |
| 19 | Sedoheptulose-1.7-bisphosphatase | S17P_WHEAT | Chloroplast | 479 | 131.5 | np | np | |
| 20 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain | RBL_LOLPR | Chloroplast | 485 | 887.3 | 650.9 | 160.2 | |
| 21 | Oxalate oxidase | GER2_WHEAT | Apoplast | 108 | 75.7 | np | np | |
| 22 | Cytochrome b6-f complex iron-sulphur subunit | Q7X9A6 | Chloroplast | 42 | 334.2 | np | np | |
| 23 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain | RBS_FAGCR | Chloroplast | 28 | 730.8 | 581.6 | 1216.2 | |
| 24 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain | RBL_LOLPR | Chloroplast | 627 | 458.1 | np | np | |
| 25 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain | RBL_LOLPR | Chloroplast | 627 | 2686.8 | 2368.2 | 350.8 | |
| 26 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain | RBL_LOLPR | Chloroplast | 627 | 271.1 | 546.1 | 604.6 | |
| 27 | Serine–glyoxylate aminotransferase | SGAT_ARATH | Apoplast | 52 | 1377.4 | 1180.8 | 214.9 | |
| 28 | Apocytochrome | CYF_LOLPR | Chloroplast | 502 | 1106.3 | 850.4 | 314.5 | |
| 29 | Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2 | PSBP_WHEAT | Chloroplast | 184 | 711.4 | 481.4 | 193.0 | |
| 30 | Oxalate oxidase | GER2_WHEAT | Chloroplast | 127 | 656.6 | 813.1 | 652.3 | |
| 31 | Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 1 | PSBO_WHEAT | Chloroplast | 1684 | 397.6 | 506.2 | 293.3 | |
Fig. 6Functional classification of differentially abundant protein identifications from spots excised (Fig. 4). Functional classifications were determined from putative identification descriptions from Uniprot.