| Literature DB >> 31010985 |
Zhihao Dong1, Junfeng Li1, Lei Chen1, Xianjun Yuan1, Tao Shao1.
Abstract
Objective: To study the contribution of plant enzyme and microbial activities on protein degradation in silage, this study evaluated the nitrogen transformation dynamics during ensiling of non- and irradiated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.).Entities:
Keywords: Alfalfa; Ensiling; Irradiation; Nitrogen Transformation; Red Clover
Year: 2019 PMID: 31010985 PMCID: PMC6718900 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
The characteristics of fresh alfalfa and red clover
| Items | Alfalfa | Red clover | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical composition | ||||
| DM (% FM) | 26.8 | 27.1 | 1.39 | 0.055 |
| Crude protein (g/kg DM) | 277 | 271 | 6.47 | 0.379 |
| TN (g/kg DM) | 44.3 | 43.3 | 1.03 | 0.379 |
| Buffer capacity (mEq kg/DM) | 442 | 385 | 7.51 | 0.105 |
DM, dry matter; FM, fresh matter; TN, total nitrogen; SEM, standard error of means (n = 4).
Effect of f γ-irradiation treatment on polyphenol oxidase activity and microbial composition
| Forage species | Treatment | PPO activity (U/g FM) | Microbial composition (cfu/g FM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| LAB | Yeast | Aerobic bacteria | |||
| Alfalfa | Control | ND | 6.27 | 4.66 | 5.26 |
| γ-Ray | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Red clover | Control | 15.6 | 6.07 | 4.72 | 5.58 |
| γ-Ray | 14.1 | ND | ND | ND | |
| SEM | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.09 | |
| p-value | |||||
| Forage species | <0.001 | 0.228 | 0.581 | 0.182 | |
| γ-Ray | 0.241 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Species×γ-ray | 0.180 | 0.228 | 0.581 | 0.581 | |
PPO, polyphenol oxidase; FM, fresh matter; cfu, colony-forming units; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; SEM, standard error of means (n = 4); ND, non-detectable.
The fermentation parameters of alfalfa and red clover treated with or without γ-ray radiation
| Stage | Forage species | DM (%) FM | pH | LA (g/kg DM) | AA (g/kg DM) | Ethanol (g/kg DM) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Control | γ-Ray | Control | γ-Ray | Control | γ-Ray | Control | γ-Ray | Control | γ-Ray | ||
| One-days silage | Alfalfa | 26.0 | 26.0 | 5.56 | 6.28 | 34.3 | 12.6 | 15.9 | 13.1 | 33.3 | 29.0 |
| Red clover | 26.7 | 27.5 | 6.07 | 5.90 | 15.1 | 11.7 | 12.3 | 11.2 | 20.1 | 17.8 | |
| Four-days silage | Alfalfa | 23.5 | 24.1 | 5.78 | 6.28 | 42.9 | 13.9 | 17.4 | 13.7 | 31.2 | 34.1 |
| Red clover | 24.5 | 24.8 | 5.98 | 5.95 | 21.5 | 15.7 | 15.5 | 13.6 | 20.8 | 20.8 | |
| Eight-days silage | Alfalfa | 23.8 | 24.8 | 4.80 | 5.85 | 57.8 | 13.1 | 20.2 | 13.0 | 34.3 | 31.3 |
| Red clover | 24.9 | 24.5 | 5.07 | 5.85 | 50.2 | 12.5 | 17.3 | 12.0 | 28.1 | 19.7 | |
| Thirty-days silage | Alfalfa | 23.8 | 25.2 | 5.35 | 5.93 | 38.3 | 13.2 | 46.1 | 13.8 | 38.7 | 31.0 |
| Red clover | 23.2 | 25.9 | 4.94 | 5.56 | 57.7 | 12.5 | 29.2 | 12.1 | 27.8 | 19.5 | |
| SEM | 0.455 | 0.046 | 0.627 | 0.269 | 0.581 | ||||||
| p-value | |||||||||||
| Forage species | 0.861 | 0.475 | 0.007 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| γ-Ray radiation | 0.963 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | ||||||
| Forage species×γ-ray radiation | 0.467 | 0.028 | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.474 | ||||||
DM, dry matter; FM, fresh matter; LA, lactic acid; AA, acetic acid; SEM, standard error of means (n = 4).
At each ensiling interval values in the same column with different capital letter differ significantly between alfalfa and red clover.
Values in the same row with different lowercase letter differ significantly between treatment and control.
The nitrogen components of alfalfa and red clover silages treated with or without γ-ray radiation
| Stage | Forage species | Peptide-N (g/kg TN) | FAA-N (g/kg TN) | NH3-N (g/kg TN) | NPN (g/kg TN) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Control | γ-Ray | Control | γ-Ray | Control | γ-Ray | Control | γ-Ray | ||
| Fresh forage | Alfalfa | 56.1 | 56.1 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 0 | 0 | 80.1 | 80.1 |
| Red clover | 41.6 | 41.6 | 7.16 | 7.16 | 0 | 0 | 47.9 | 47.9 | |
| One-days silage | Alfalfa | 91.6 | 297 | 112 | 224 | 26.8 | 11.8 | 293 | 447 |
| Red clover | 103 | 95.1 | 41.4 | 18.8 | 12.1 | 8.60 | 198 | 153 | |
| Four-days silage | Alfalfa | 311 | 210 | 149 | 159 | 26.8 | 18.6 | 479 | 395 |
| Red clover | 83.9 | 107 | 49.2 | 45.5 | 24.1 | 14.2 | 206 | 211 | |
| Eight-days silage | Alfalfa | 247 | 221 | 297 | 213 | 58.4 | 24.4 | 511 | 420 |
| Red clover | 148 | 106 | 77.9 | 37.4 | 33.8 | 16.2 | 286 | 201 | |
| Thirty-days silage | Alfalfa | 259 | 236 | 297 | 321 | 78.0 | 35.4 | 519 | 484 |
| Red clover | 71.5 | 80.6 | 56.6 | 60.1 | 48.2 | 22.1 | 280 | 219 | |
| SEM | 4.76 | 1.99 | 1.77 | 5.91 | |||||
| p-value | |||||||||
| Forage species | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
| γ-Ray radiation | 0.017 | 0.004 | 0.021 | <0.001 | |||||
| Forage species×γ-ray radiation | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.203 | <0.001 | |||||
TN, total nitrogen; FAA-N, free amino acid N; NH3-N, ammonia N; NPN, non-protein N; SEM, standard error of means (n = 4).
At each ensiling interval values in the same column with different capital letter differ significantly between alfalfa and red clover.
Values in the same row with different lowercase letter differ significantly between treatment and control.