Literature DB >> 2710637

Auditory apparent motion under binaural and monaural listening conditions.

T Z Strybel, C L Manligas, D R Perrott.   

Abstract

This investigation examined the ability of listeners to perceive apparent motion under binaural and monaural listening conditions. Fifty-millisecond broadband noise sources were presented through two speakers separated in space by either 10 degrees, 40 degrees, or 160 degrees, centered about the subject's midline. On each trial, the sources were temporally separated by 1 of 12 interstimulus onset intervals (ISOIs). Six listeners were asked to place their experience of these sounds into one of five categories (single sound, simultaneous sounds, continuous motion, broken motion, or successive sounds), and to indicate either the proper temporal sequence of presentation or the direction of motion, depending on whether or not motion was perceived. Each listener was tested at all spatial separations under binaural and monaural listening conditions. Motion was perceived in the binaural listening condition at all spatial separations tested for ISOIs between 20 and 130 msec. In the monaural listening condition, motion was reliably heard by all subjects at 10 degrees and 40 degrees for the same range of ISOIs. At 160 degrees, only 3 of the 6 subjects consistently reported motion. However, when motion was perceived in the monaural condition, the direction of motion could not be determined.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710637     DOI: 10.3758/bf03204951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  5 in total

1.  Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory apparent movement under dichotic listening conditions.

Authors:  R M Briggs; D R Perrott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-01

3.  Are there neurons detecting direction of sound source motion?

Authors:  J A Altman
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Discrimination of perceived movement velocity for fused auditory image in dichotic stimulation.

Authors:  J A Altman; O V Viskov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Visual motion detection models: features and frequency filters.

Authors:  C Bonnet
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Auditory apparent motion in the free field: the effects of stimulus duration and separation.

Authors:  T Z Strybel; A M Witty; D R Perrott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  A comparison of the effects of spatial separation on apparent motion in the auditory and visual modalities.

Authors:  T Z Strybel; C L Manligas; O Chan; D R Perrott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-05

3.  Temporal constraints on apparent motion in auditory space.

Authors:  S Lakatos
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

4.  The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.