Literature DB >> 1508620

Auditory apparent motion in the free field: the effects of stimulus duration and separation.

T Z Strybel1, A M Witty, D R Perrott.   

Abstract

The effects of stimulus duration and spatial separation on the illusion of apparent motion in the auditory modality were examined. Two narrow-band noise sources (40 dB, A-weighted) were presented through speakers separated in space by 2.5 degrees, 5 degrees, or 10 degrees, centered about the subject's midline. The duration of each stimulus was 5, 10, or 50 msec. On each trial, the sound pair was temporally separated by 1 of 10 interstimulus onset intervals (ISOIs): 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 50, or 70 msec. Five subjects were tested in nine trial block; each block represented a particular spatial-separation-duration combination. Within a trial block, each ISOI was presented 30 times each, in random order. Subjects were instructed to listen to the stimulus sequence and classify their perception of the sound into one of five categories: single sound, simultaneous sounds, continuous motion, broken motion, or successive sounds. Each subject was also required to identify the location of the first-occurring stimulus (left or right). The percentage of continuous-motion responses was significantly affected by the ISOI [F(9,36) = 5.67, p less than .001], the duration x ISOI interaction [F(18,72) = 3.54, p less than .0001], and the separation x duration x ISOI interaction [F(36,144) = 1.51, p less than .05]. The results indicate that a minimum duration is required for the perception of auditory apparent motion. Little or no motion was reported at durations of 10 msec or less. At a duration of 50 msec, motion was reported most often for ISOIs of 20-50 msec.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1508620     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of the effects of spatial separation on apparent motion in the auditory and visual modalities.

Authors:  T Z Strybel; C L Manligas; O Chan; D R Perrott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-05

2.  Auditory apparent motion under binaural and monaural listening conditions.

Authors:  T Z Strybel; C L Manligas; D R Perrott
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-04

3.  Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory apparent movement under dichotic listening conditions.

Authors:  R M Briggs; D R Perrott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-01

5.  Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion.

Authors:  C L Baker; O J Braddick
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.