Literature DB >> 22559377

Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing.

Anisa S Visram1, Mahan Azadpour, Karolina Kluk, Colette M McKay.   

Abstract

This study investigated which acoustic cues within the speech signal are responsible for bimodal speech perception benefit. Seven cochlear implant (CI) users with usable residual hearing at low frequencies in the non-implanted ear participated. Sentence tests were performed in near-quiet (some noise on the CI side to reduce scores from ceiling) and in a modulated noise background, with the implant alone and with the addition, in the hearing ear, of one of four types of acoustic signals derived from the same sentences: (1) a complex tone modulated by the fundamental frequency (F0) and amplitude envelope contours; (2) a pure tone modulated by the F0 and amplitude contours; (3) a noise-vocoded signal; (4) unprocessed speech. The modulated tones provided F0 information without spectral shape information, whilst the vocoded signal presented spectral shape information without F0 information. For the group as a whole, only the unprocessed speech condition provided significant benefit over implant-alone scores, in both near-quiet and noise. This suggests that, on average, F0 or spectral cues in isolation provided limited benefit for these subjects in the tested listening conditions, and that the significant benefit observed in the full-signal condition was derived from implantees' use of a combination of these cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559377     DOI: 10.1121/1.3699191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Soo Hee Oh; Gail S Donaldson; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Kelly Jahn; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; René H Gifford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Matthew B Winn; Katja Poellmann; Gail S Donaldson
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  No Evidence That Music Training Benefits Speech Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Colette M McKay
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Effects of the intensified frequency and time ranges on consonant enhancement in bilateral cochlear implant and hearing aid users.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Carrie Drew
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-16

7.  Reduced acoustic and electric integration in concurrent-vowel recognition.

Authors:  Hsin-I Yang; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.