Literature DB >> 2710616

On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: the neighborhood frequency effect.

J Grainger, J K O'Regan, A M Jacobs, J Segui.   

Abstract

Current models of word recognition generally assume that word units orthographically similar to a stimulus word are involved in the visual recognition of this word. We refer to this set of orthographically similar words as an orthographic neighborhood. Two experiments are presented that investigate the ways in which the composition of this neighborhood can affect word recognition. The data indicate that the presence in the neighborhood of at least one unit of higher frequency than the stimulus word itself results in interference in stimulus word processing. Lexical decision latencies (Experiment 1) and gaze durations (Experiment 2) to words with one neighbor of higher frequency were significantly longer than to words without a more frequent neighbor. This neighborhood frequency effect is discussed in terms of the different types of candidate selection process postulated by contemporary models of visual word recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710616     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  The effect of competition on visual duration threshold and its independence of stimulus frequency.

Authors:  L L HAVENS; W E FOOTE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-01

2.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Word recognition: context effects without priming.

Authors:  D Norris
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-03

4.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.

Authors:  J K O'Regan; A Lévy-Schoen; J Pynte; B Brugaillère
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.

Authors:  D A Balota; J I Chumbley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-06

7.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  K R Paap; S L Newsome; J E McDonald; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

  7 in total
  39 in total

1.  Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony.

Authors:  M Perea; E Rosa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

3.  Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition.

Authors:  Laree A Huntsman; Susan D Lima
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-05

4.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jo Hector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

5.  Neighborhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography.

Authors:  Lisa S Arduino; Cristina Burani
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2004-01

6.  Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.

Authors:  J Grainger; J K O'Regan; A M Jacobs; J Segui
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

7.  Comparing nouns and verbs in a lexical task.

Authors:  Françoise Cordier; Jean-Claude Croizet; François Rigalleau
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-02

8.  The effect of orthographic and emotional neighbourhood in a colour categorization task.

Authors:  Anna-Malika Camblats; Stéphanie Mathey
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-11-09

9.  Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

10.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.