Literature DB >> 27105206

Alchemical Free Energy Calculations and Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Measurements of Aminoadamantanes Bound to the Closed State of Influenza A/M2TM.

Harris Ioannidis1, Antonios Drakopoulos1, Christina Tzitzoglaki1, Nadine Homeyer2, Felix Kolarov3, Paraskevi Gkeka4, Kathrin Freudenberger3, Christos Liolios5, Günter Gauglitz3, Zoe Cournia4, Holger Gohlke2, Antonios Kolocouris1.   

Abstract

Adamantane derivatives, such as amantadine and rimantadine, have been reported to block the transmembrane domain (TM) of the M2 protein of influenza A virus (A/M2) but their clinical use has been discontinued due to evolved resistance in humans. Although experiments and simulations have provided adequate information about the binding interaction of amantadine or rimantadine to the M2 protein, methods for predicting binding affinities of whole series of M2 inhibitors have so far been scarcely applied. Such methods could assist in the development of novel potent inhibitors that overcome A/M2 resistance. Here we show that alchemical free energy calculations of ligand binding using the Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR) method are valuable for determining the relative binding potency of A/M2 inhibitors of the aminoadamantane type covering a binding affinity range of only ∼2 kcal mol(-1). Their binding affinities measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) against the A/M2TM tetramer from the Udorn strain in its closed form at pH 8 were used as experimental probes. The binding constants of rimantadine enantiomers against M2TMUdorn were measured for the first time and found to be equal. Two series of alchemical free energy calculations were performed using 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) and 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) lipids to mimic the membrane environment. A fair correlation was found for DPPC that was significantly improved using DMPC, which resembles more closely the DPC lipids used in the ITC experiments. This demonstrates that binding free energy calculations by the BAR approach can be used to predict relative binding affinities of aminoadamantane derivatives toward M2TM with good accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27105206     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  12 in total

1.  Affinity of Rimantadine Enantiomers against Influenza A/M2 Protein Revisited.

Authors:  Antonios Drakopoulos; Christina Tzitzoglaki; Chulong Ma; Kathrin Freudenberger; Anja Hoffmann; Yanmei Hu; Günter Gauglitz; Michaela Schmidtke; Jun Wang; Antonios Kolocouris
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  The L46P mutant confers a novel allosteric mechanism of resistance toward the influenza A virus M2 S31N proton channel blockers.

Authors:  Rami Musharrafieh; Panagiotis I Lagarias; Chunlong Ma; Gene S Tan; Antonios Kolocouris; Jun Wang
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  On the role of water density fluctuations in the inhibition of a proton channel.

Authors:  Eleonora Gianti; Lucie Delemotte; Michael L Klein; Vincenzo Carnevale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Unraveling the Binding, Proton Blockage, and Inhibition of Influenza M2 WT and S31N by Rimantadine Variants.

Authors:  Antonios Drakopoulos; Christina Tzitzoglaki; Kelly McGuire; Anja Hoffmann; Athina Konstantinidi; Dimitrios Kolokouris; Chunlong Ma; Kathrin Freudenberger; Johanna Hutterer; Günter Gauglitz; Jun Wang; Michaela Schmidtke; David D Busath; Antonios Kolocouris
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Relative binding affinity prediction of farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 using FEP.

Authors:  Christina Schindler; Friedrich Rippmann; Daniel Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Binding and Proton Blockage by Amantadine Variants of the Influenza M2WT and M2S31N Explained.

Authors:  Christina Tzitzoglaki; Anna Wright; Kathrin Freudenberger; Anja Hoffmann; Ian Tietjen; Ioannis Stylianakis; Felix Kolarov; David Fedida; Michaela Schmidtke; Günter Gauglitz; Timothy A Cross; Antonios Kolocouris
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.039

Review 7.  From Acid Activation Mechanisms of Proton Conduction to Design of Inhibitors of the M2 Proton Channel of Influenza A Virus.

Authors:  Elnaz Aledavood; Beatrice Selmi; Carolina Estarellas; Matteo Masetti; F Javier Luque
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-14

8.  Comparative Interaction Studies of Quercetin with 2-Hydroxyl-propyl-β-cyclodextrin and 2,6-Methylated-β-cyclodextrin.

Authors:  Vasiliki Vakali; Michail Papadourakis; Nikitas Georgiou; Nikoletta Zoupanou; Dimitrios A Diamantis; Uroš Javornik; Paraskevi Papakyriakopoulou; Janez Plavec; Georgia Valsami; Andreas G Tzakos; Demeter Tzeli; Zoe Cournia; Thomas Mauromoustakos
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  Rimantadine Binds to and Inhibits the Influenza A M2 Proton Channel without Enantiomeric Specificity.

Authors:  Jessica L Thomaston; Marley L Samways; Athina Konstantinidi; Chunlong Ma; Yanmei Hu; Hannah E Bruce Macdonald; Jun Wang; Jonathan W Essex; William F DeGrado; Antonios Kolocouris
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.321

10.  Influenza A M2 Inhibitor Binding Understood through Mechanisms of Excess Proton Stabilization and Channel Dynamics.

Authors:  Laura C Watkins; William F DeGrado; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.