Literature DB >> 18797037

Effect of duration of passive stretch on hip abduction range of motion.

S W Madding, J G Wong, A Hallum, J Medeiros.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine which of three durations of a passive stretch was most effective in increasing hip abduction range of motion (ROM) in human subjects. Seventy-two men were randomly assigned into a control group and three passive stretch groups (15 seconds, 45 seconds, and 2 minutes). The two measurements used to determine hip abduction flexibility were abduction ROM and resistance to abduction force. Each subject was measured before and immediately following the passive stretch to determine changes in abduction ROM and resistance to abduction force due to a passive stretch. The results of this study indicated that hip abduction ROM was significantly increased and resistance to hip abduction force was significantly decreased after a passive stretch for all three stretch groups. There was no significant difference between mean differences of abduction ROM of the three stretch groups, except for the comparison of the 15 second and the 45 second stretch groups. The results of the force data demonstrated no significant difference between the mean differences of the three stretch groups. The fact that our data shows 15 seconds is just as effective as stretching for 2 minutes makes it reasonable to stretch for 15 seconds in athletic settings where immediate increases in abduction ROM are desired. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987;8(8):409-416.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 18797037     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1987.8.8.409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  8 in total

1.  Pulsed Shortwave Diathermy and Prolonged Long-Duration Stretching Increase Dorsiflexion Range of Motion More Than Identical Stretching Without Diathermy.

Authors:  Steven E Peres; David O Draper; Kenneth L Knight; Mark D Ricard
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  The effects of stretching on strength performance.

Authors:  Ercole C Rubini; André L L Costa; Paulo S C Gomes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Comparing the effects of self-myofascial release with static stretching on ankle range-of-motion in adolescent athletes.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Chris Beardsley; Igor Štirn
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

4.  STATIC STRETCHING DOES NOT REDUCE VARIABILITY, JUMP AND SPEED PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Luís Manuel Pinto Lopes Rama
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

5.  Patient education in physiotherapy of low back pain: acute outcomes of group instruction.

Authors:  S D Alston; T J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Effectiveness of Scapular Stabilization Versus Non-Stabilization Stretching on Shoulder Range of Motion, a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alan J Howell; Andrew Burchett; Nicholas Heebner; Cody Walker; Alec Baunach; Asia Seidt; Tim L Uhl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-06-01

7.  Effect of static stretching of muscles surrounding the knee on knee joint position sense.

Authors:  Farahnaz Ghaffarinejad; Shohreh Taghizadeh; Farshid Mohammadi
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  The Acute Effects of Upper Extremity Stretching on Throwing Velocity in Baseball Throwers.

Authors:  Michael Williams; Lanisa Harveson; Jason Melton; Ashley Delobel; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2013-11-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.