Literature DB >> 27103130

[Metal implant allergy update].

P Thomas1.   

Abstract

Intolerance reactions to metal implants may also be caused by metal allergy. A differential diagnostic workup must be performed based on the complaints of the patient. For patch testing the standard series with its nickel, cobalt, chromium preparations is used. There is no consensus regarding implant metal test series or, for example, bone cement test series; however, progress is being made. The combination of several diagnostic tools including histology is useful. The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) must be performed by experienced laboratories and results must be carefully evaluated. New insights into pathomechanisms of intolerance reactions to metal implants and identification of potential biomarkers are expected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromium; Cobalt; Lymphocyte transformation test; Nickel; Patch test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27103130     DOI: 10.1007/s00105-016-3792-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  13 in total

1.  [Synovial biomarkers for differential diagnosis of painful arthroplasty].

Authors:  I J Banke; N Stade; P M Prodinger; H M Mühlhofer; P Thomas; B Thomas; B Summer; M van Griensven; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  High frequency of contact allergy to implant and bone cement components, in particular gentamicin, in cemented arthroplasty with complications: usefulness of late patch test reading.

Authors:  Benjamin Thomas; Daniela Kulichova; Ronald Wolf; Burkhard Summer; Vera Mahler; Peter Thomas
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  [Allergy diagnostics in suspected implant intolerance: practical approach. A position paper of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG)].

Authors:  J Geier; H Lessmann; D Becker; P Thomas
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Hip and knee replacement in Germany and the USA: analysis of individual inpatient data from German and US hospitals for the years 2005 to 2011.

Authors:  Annelene Wengler; Ulrike Nimptsch; Thomas Mansky
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of patients with allergy to metal implants.

Authors:  Peter Thomas; Burkhard Summer
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 6.  Metal ions as inflammatory initiators of osteolysis.

Authors:  Kevin Magone; Daniel Luckenbill; Tarun Goswami
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  [Use of allergy implants in Germany: results of a survey].

Authors:  M Thomsen; M Rozak; P Thomas
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies: joint statement by the implant allergy working group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German association of orthopedics and orthopedic surgery), DKG (German contact dermatitis research group) and dgaki (German society for allergology and clinical immunology)].

Authors:  P Thomas; A Schuh; J Ring; M Thomsen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Patients with intolerance reactions to total knee replacement: combined assessment of allergy diagnostics, periprosthetic histology, and peri-implant cytokine expression pattern.

Authors:  Peter Thomas; Christine von der Helm; Christoph Schopf; Farhad Mazoochian; Lars Frommelt; Hans Gollwitzer; Josef Schneider; Michael Flaig; Veit Krenn; Benjamin Thomas; Burkhard Summer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Clinical and diagnostic challenges of metal implant allergy using the example of orthopaedic surgical implants: Part 15 of the Series Molecular Allergology.

Authors:  Peter Thomas
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2014-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.