Literature DB >> 27098909

Elevated Linkage Disequilibrium and Signatures of Soft Sweeps Are Common in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nandita R Garud1, Dmitri A Petrov2.   

Abstract

The extent to which selection and demography impact patterns of genetic diversity in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster is yet to be fully understood. We previously observed that linkage disequilibrium (LD) at scales of ∼10 kb in the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP), consisting of 145 inbred strains from Raleigh, North Carolina, measured both between pairs of sites and as haplotype homozygosity, is elevated above neutral demographic expectations. We also demonstrated that signatures of strong and recent soft sweeps are abundant. However, the extent to which these patterns are specific to this derived and admixed population is unknown. It is also unclear whether these patterns are a consequence of the extensive inbreeding performed to generate the DGRP data. Here we analyze LD statistics in a sample of >100 fully-sequenced strains from Zambia; an ancestral population to the Raleigh population that has experienced little to no admixture and was generated by sequencing haploid embryos rather than inbred strains. We find an elevation in long-range LD and haplotype homozygosity compared to neutral expectations in the Zambian sample, thus showing the elevation in LD is not specific to the DGRP data set. This elevation in LD and haplotype structure remains even after controlling for possible confounders including genomic inversions, admixture, population substructure, close relatedness of individual strains, and recombination rate variation. Furthermore, signatures of partial soft sweeps similar to those found in the DGRP as well as partial hard sweeps are common in Zambia. These results suggest that while the selective forces and sources of adaptive mutations may differ in Zambia and Raleigh, elevated long-range LD and signatures of soft sweeps are generic in D. melanogaster.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; demography; haplotype homozygosity; linkage disequilibrium; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098909      PMCID: PMC4896199          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.184002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  58 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The effect of gene conversion on intralocus associations.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; M Nordborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Fábio K Mendes; Matthew W Hahn; Andrew D Kern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  On the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of positive and negative selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  John Parsch; Sergey Novozhilov; Sarah S Saminadin-Peter; Karen M Wong; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay; Stephen Richards; Eric A Stone; Antonio Barbadilla; Julien F Ayroles; Dianhui Zhu; Sònia Casillas; Yi Han; Michael M Magwire; Julie M Cridland; Mark F Richardson; Robert R H Anholt; Maite Barrón; Crystal Bess; Kerstin Petra Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; David Castellano; Lesley Chaboub; Laura Duncan; Zeke Harris; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Christina Jayaseelan; Shalini N Jhangiani; Katherine W Jordan; Fremiet Lara; Faye Lawrence; Sandra L Lee; Pablo Librado; Raquel S Linheiro; Richard F Lyman; Aaron J Mackey; Mala Munidasa; Donna Marie Muzny; Lynne Nazareth; Irene Newsham; Lora Perales; Ling-Ling Pu; Carson Qu; Miquel Ràmia; Jeffrey G Reid; Stephanie M Rollmann; Julio Rozas; Nehad Saada; Lavanya Turlapati; Kim C Worley; Yuan-Qing Wu; Akihiko Yamamoto; Yiming Zhu; Casey M Bergman; Kevin R Thornton; David Mittelman; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Mosaic Ancestry of the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel and the D. melanogaster Reference Genome Reveals a Network of Epistatic Fitness Interactions.

Authors:  John E Pool
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Inferring Demographic History Using Two-Locus Statistics.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in Drosophila in the presence of gene conversion.

Authors:  José Luis Campos; Lei Zhao; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Repeated origins, widespread gene flow, and allelic interactions of target-site herbicide resistance mutations.

Authors:  John R Stinchcombe; Stephen I Wright; Julia M Kreiner; George Sandler; Aaron J Stern; Patrick J Tranel; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Fine scale mapping of genomic introgressions within the Drosophila yakuba clade.

Authors:  David A Turissini; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 5.  Detecting positive selection in the genome.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Benjamin C Jackson; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  A Large Panel of Drosophila simulans Reveals an Abundance of Common Variants.

Authors:  Sarah A Signor; Felicia N New; Sergey Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 7.  Molecular Population Genetics.

Authors:  Sònia Casillas; Antonio Barbadilla
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Temporal Variation in Genetic Composition of Migratory Helicoverpa Zea in Peripheral Populations.

Authors:  Omaththage P Perera; Howard W Fescemyer; Shelby J Fleischer; Craig A Abel
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Structural Variants and Selective Sweep Foci Contribute to Insecticide Resistance in the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel.

Authors:  Paul Battlay; Pontus B Leblanc; Llewellyn Green; Nandita R Garud; Joshua M Schmidt; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Charles Robin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Understanding the Factors That Shape Patterns of Nucleotide Diversity in the House Mouse Genome.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.