Literature DB >> 27098692

Ligand Specificity and Evolution of Mammalian Musk Odor Receptors: Effect of Single Receptor Deletion on Odor Detection.

Narumi Sato-Akuhara1, Nao Horio1, Aya Kato-Namba2, Keiichi Yoshikawa2, Yoshihito Niimura3, Sayoko Ihara3, Mika Shirasu4, Kazushige Touhara4.   

Abstract

Musk odors have been used widely for fragrance and medicine for >2000 years because of their fascinating scent and physiological effects. Therefore, fragrance manufacturers have been eager to develop high-quality musk compounds that are safe and easily synthesized. We recently identified muscone-responsive olfactory receptors (ORs) MOR215-1 and OR5AN1 in mice and humans, respectively (Shirasu et al., 2014). In this study, we identified musk ORs that are evolutionarily closely related to MOR215-1 or OR5AN1 in various primates and investigated structure-activity relationships for various musk odorants and related compounds. We found that each species has one or two functional musk ORs that exhibit specific ligand spectra to musk compounds. Some of them, including the human OR5AN1, responded to nitro musks with chemical properties distinct from muscone. The ligand specificity of OR5AN1 reflects the perception of musk odors in humans. Genetic deletion of MOR215-1 in mice resulted in drastic reduction of sensitivity to muscone, suggesting that MOR215-1 plays a critical role in muscone perception. Therefore, the current study reveals a clear link between the identified OR and muscone perception. Moreover, the strategy established for screening ligands for the muscone OR may facilitate the development of novel and commercially useful musk odors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The long-sought musk odor receptor family in mammals was discovered and found to be well conserved and narrowly tuned to musk odors. In mice, deletion of the most sensitive musk receptor resulted in drastic reduction in sensitivity to muscone, demonstrating a strong link between receptor and odor perception. In humans, we found one musk receptor that recognized both macrocyclic and nitro musks that had distinct chemical structures. The structure-activity relationships were in a good agreement with human sensory perception and therefore may be used to develop novel musk aroma in fragrance fields. Finally, identification of a natural ligand(s) for musk receptors in mammals other than musk deer would reveal an evolutionarily pivotal role in each species in the future.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/364482-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; human; mouse; musk; olfactory; receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098692      PMCID: PMC6601836          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3259-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  27 in total

1.  Combinatorial receptor codes for odors.

Authors:  B Malnic; J Hirono; T Sato; L B Buck
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-03-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Enantioselectivity of the musk odor sensation.

Authors:  P Kraft; G Fráter
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.437

3.  Electronic van der Waals surface property descriptors and genetic algorithms for developing structure-activity correlations in olfactory databases.

Authors:  Barry K Lavine; Charles E Davidson; Curt Breneman; William Katt; C Matthew Sundling
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

4.  Stereochemical theory of olfaction.

Authors:  J E AMOORE
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Evaluating cell-surface expression and measuring activation of mammalian odorant receptors in heterologous cells.

Authors:  Hanyi Zhuang; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  New macrocyclic musk compounds.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsuda; Shinya Watanabe; Kenichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception.

Authors:  Andreas Keller; Hanyi Zhuang; Qiuyi Chi; Leslie B Vosshall; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire.

Authors:  Harumi Saito; Qiuyi Chi; Hanyi Zhuang; Hiroaki Matsunami; Joel D Mainland
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  The effects of odor on cortisol and testosterone in healthy adults.

Authors:  Hajime Fukui; Ryoichi Komaki; Miho Okui; Kumiko Toyoshima; Kiyoto Kuda
Journal:  Neuro Endocrinol Lett       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.765

10.  Genetic elucidation of human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid.

Authors:  Idan Menashe; Tatjana Abaffy; Yehudit Hasin; Sivan Goshen; Vered Yahalom; Charles W Luetje; Doron Lancet
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The role of metals in mammalian olfaction of low molecular weight organosulfur compounds.

Authors:  Eric Block; Victor S Batista; Hiroaki Matsunami; Hanyi Zhuang; Lucky Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 13.423

2.  Mapping odorant sensitivities reveals a sparse but structured representation of olfactory chemical space by sensory input to the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shawn D Burton; Audrey Brown; Thomas P Eiting; Isaac A Youngstrom; Thomas C Rust; Michael Schmuker; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 3.  Synthesis of Cyclic Fragrances via Transformations of Alkenes, Alkynes and Enynes: Strategies and Recent Progress.

Authors:  Zhigeng Lin; Baoying Huang; Lufeng Ouyang; Liyao Zheng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  The behavioral sensitivity of mice to acetate esters.

Authors:  Liam Jennings; Ellie Williams; Marta Avlas; Adam Dewan
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.985

5.  Modulation of the combinatorial code of odorant receptor response patterns in odorant mixtures.

Authors:  Claire A de March; William B Titlow; Tomoko Sengoku; Patrick Breheny; Hiroaki Matsunami; Timothy S McClintock
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.314

6.  Encoding the Odor of Cigarette Smoke.

Authors:  Timothy S McClintock; Naazneen Khan; Yelena Alimova; Madeline Aulisio; Dong Y Han; Patrick Breheny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Live-cell Measurement of Odorant Receptor Activation Using a Real-time cAMP Assay.

Authors:  Yuetian Zhang; Yi Pan; Hiroaki Matsunami; Hanyi Zhuang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Molecular mechanism of activation of human musk receptors OR5AN1 and OR1A1 by (R)-muscone and diverse other musk-smelling compounds.

Authors:  Lucky Ahmed; Yuetian Zhang; Eric Block; Michael Buehl; Michael J Corr; Rodrigo A Cormanich; Sivaji Gundala; Hiroaki Matsunami; David O'Hagan; Mehmet Ozbil; Yi Pan; Sivakumar Sekharan; Nicholas Ten; Mingan Wang; Mingyan Yang; Qingzhi Zhang; Ruina Zhang; Victor S Batista; Hanyi Zhuang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Deconstructing the mouse olfactory percept through an ethological atlas.

Authors:  Diogo Manoel; Melanie Makhlouf; Charles J Arayata; Abbirami Sathappan; Sahar Da'as; Doua Abdelrahman; Senthil Selvaraj; Reem Hasnah; Joel D Mainland; Richard C Gerkin; Luis R Saraiva
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 10.900

10.  Functional odor classification through a medicinal chemistry approach.

Authors:  Erwan Poivet; Narmin Tahirova; Zita Peterlin; Lu Xu; Dong-Jing Zou; Terry Acree; Stuart Firestein
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.