Literature DB >> 32801155

Encoding the Odor of Cigarette Smoke.

Timothy S McClintock1, Naazneen Khan2, Yelena Alimova2, Madeline Aulisio3, Dong Y Han4, Patrick Breheny5.   

Abstract

The encoding of odors is believed to begin as a combinatorial code consisting of distinct patterns of responses from odorant receptors (ORs), trace-amine associated receptors (TAARs), or both. To determine how specific response patterns arise requires detecting patterns in vivo and understanding how the components of an odor, which are nearly always mixtures of odorants, give rise to parts of the pattern. Cigarette smoke, a common and clinically relevant odor consisting of >400 odorants, evokes responses from 144 ORs and 3 TAARs in freely behaving male and female mice, the first example of in vivo responses of both ORs and TAARs to an odor. As expected, a simplified artificial mimic of cigarette smoke odor tested at low concentration to identify highly sensitive receptors evokes responses from four ORs, all also responsive to cigarette smoke. Human subjects of either sex identify 1-pentanethiol as the odorant most critical for perception of the artificial mimic; and in mice the OR response patterns to these two odors are significantly similar. Fifty-eight ORs respond to the headspace above 25% 1-pentanethiol, including 9 ORs responsive to cigarette smoke. The response patterns to both cigarette smoke and 1-pentanethiol have strongly responsive ORs spread widely across OR sequence diversity, consistent with most other combinatorial codes previously measured in vivo The encoding of cigarette smoke is accomplished by a broad receptor response pattern, and 1-pentanethiol is responsible for a small subset of the responsive ORs in this combinatorial code.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Complex odors are usually perceived as distinct odor objects. Cigarette smoke is the first complex odor whose in vivo receptor response pattern has been measured. It is also the first pattern shown to include responses from both odorant receptors and trace-amine associated receptors, confirming that the encoding of complex odors can be enriched by signals coming through both families of receptors. Measures of human perception and mouse receptor physiology agree that 1-pentanethiol is a critical component of a simplified odorant mixture designed to mimic cigarette smoke odor. Its receptor response pattern helps to link those of the artificial mimic and real cigarette smoke, consistent with expectations about perceptual similarity arising from shared elements in receptor response patterns.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPCR; olfaction; perception; physiology; sensory; smoking

Year:  2020        PMID: 32801155      PMCID: PMC7480249          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1144-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  Representation of odorants by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  M Wachowiak; L B Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants.

Authors:  Yuki Oka; Masayo Omura; Hiroshi Kataoka; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Recurrent cortical circuits implement concentration-invariant odor coding.

Authors:  Kevin A Bolding; Kevin M Franks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception.

Authors:  C Trimmer; A Keller; N R Murphy; L L Snyder; J R Willer; M H Nagai; N Katsanis; L B Vosshall; H Matsunami; J D Mainland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sensitivity-dependent hierarchical receptor codes for odors.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hamana; Junzo Hirono; Miwako Kizumi; Takaaki Sato
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Agonists for 13 trace amine-associated receptors provide insight into the molecular basis of odor selectivity.

Authors:  David M Ferrero; Daniel Wacker; Miguel A Roque; Maude W Baldwin; Raymond C Stevens; Stephen D Liberles
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.100

7.  Selective imaging of presynaptic activity in the mouse olfactory bulb shows concentration and structure dependence of odor responses in identified glomeruli.

Authors:  Hans U Fried; Stefan H Fuss; Sigrun I Korsching
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genomics of mature and immature olfactory sensory neurons.

Authors:  Melissa D Nickell; Patrick Breheny; Arnold J Stromberg; Timothy S McClintock
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Relationships between molecular structure and perceived odor quality of ligands for a human olfactory receptor.

Authors:  Guenhaël Sanz; Thierry Thomas-Danguin; El Hassan Hamdani; Claire Le Poupon; Loïc Briand; Jean-Claude Pernollet; Elisabeth Guichard; Anne Tromelin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Activity-dependent genes in mouse olfactory sensory neurons.

Authors:  Adrian M Fischl; Paula M Heron; Arnold J Stromberg; Timothy S McClintock
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Chemosensory Contributions of E-Cigarette Additives on Nicotine Use.

Authors:  Natalie L Johnson; Theresa Patten; Minghong Ma; Mariella De Biasi; Daniel W Wesson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.152

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.