| Literature DB >> 27092499 |
Saeko Tada-Oikawa1,2, Gaku Ichihara3, Hitomi Fukatsu4, Yuka Shimanuki5, Natsuki Tanaka6, Eri Watanabe7, Yuka Suzuki8, Masahiko Murakami9, Kiyora Izuoka10, Jie Chang11, Wenting Wu12, Yoshiji Yamada13, Sahoko Ichihara14,15.
Abstract
Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles are widely used in cosmetics, sunscreens, biomedicine, and food products. When used as a food additive, TiO₂ nanoparticles are used in significant amounts as white food-coloring agents. However, the effects of TiO₂ nanoparticles on the gastrointestinal tract remain unclear. The present study was designed to determine the effects of five TiO₂ particles of different crystal structures and sizes in human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma (Caco-2) cells and THP-1 monocyte-derived macrophages. Twenty-four-hour exposure to anatase (primary particle size: 50 and 100 nm) and rutile (50 nm) TiO₂ particles reduced cellular viability in a dose-dependent manner in THP-1 macrophages, but in not Caco-2 cells. However, 72-h exposure of Caco-2 cells to anatase (50 nm) TiO₂ particles reduced cellular viability in a dose-dependent manner. The highest dose (50 µg/mL) of anatase (100 nm), rutile (50 nm), and P25 TiO₂ particles also reduced cellular viability in Caco-2 cells. The production of reactive oxygen species tended to increase in both types of cells, irrespective of the type of TiO₂ particle. Exposure of THP-1 macrophages to 50 µg/mL of anatase (50 nm) TiO₂ particles increased interleukin (IL)-1β expression level, and exposure of Caco-2 cells to 50 µg/mL of anatase (50 nm) TiO₂ particles also increased IL-8 expression. The results indicated that anatase TiO₂ nanoparticles induced inflammatory responses compared with other TiO₂ particles. Further studies are required to determine the in vivo relevance of these findings to avoid the hazards of ingested particles.Entities:
Keywords: food additive; inflammation; intestinal epithelium; macrophage; nanoparticles; reactive oxygen species; titanium dioxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27092499 PMCID: PMC4849032 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17040576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Characterization of TiO2 particles.
| Particles | Primary Diameter (nm) | Medium | Hydrodynamic Size (nm) | PdI | ζ Potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A50 | 50 | RPMI1640 (10% FBS) | 205.30 ± 4.88 | 0.319 ± 0.007 | −11.86 ± 1.47 |
| DMEM (10% FBS) | 227.78 ± 3.62 | 0.291 ± 0.012 | −11.31 ± 0.39 | ||
| A100 | 100 | RPMI1640 (10% FBS) | 262.10 ± 4.66 | 0.191 ± 0.026 | −11.66 ± 1.38 |
| DMEM (10% FBS) | 253.40 ± 4.11 | 0.171 ± 0.010 | −11.84 ± 1.74 | ||
| R50 | 50 | RPMI1640 (10% FBS) | 193.28 ± 1.37 | 0.120 ± 0.032 | −13.15 ± 1.05 |
| DMEM (10% FBS) | 194.20 ± 2.14 | 0.123 ± 0.011 | −11.66 ± 0.64 | ||
| R250 | 250 | RPMI1640 (10% FBS) | 439.13 ± 8.665 | 0.163 ± 0.010 | −12.18 ± 0.59 |
| DMEM (10% FBS) | 441.28 ± 6.65 | 0.155 ± 0.025 | −11.75 ± 1.14 | ||
| P25 | 21 | RPMI1640 (10% FBS) | 181.55 ± 1.10 | 0.153 ± 0.014 | −13.10 ± 1.57 |
| DMEM (10% FBS) | 193.85 ± 1.86 | 0.142 ± 0.008 | −12.26 ± 1.11 |
Data are mean ± SD of three or four independent experiments. PdI: polydispersity index; RPMI: roswell park memorial institute; DMEM: dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium; FBS: fetal bovine serum; TiO2: titanium dioxide.
Figure 1Histogram of particle size measured by dynamic light scattering technology. (A) anatase (50 nm); (B) rutile (50 nm); and (C) P25 (21 nm) titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) suspensions were dispersed using a sonicator (model 450, Branson Sonifier, Danbury, CT, USA) set at 100 watt (W), 80% pulse mode, for 15 min.
Figure 2Cytotoxic effects of dispersed TiO2 particles on THP-1 macrophages. Cytotoxicity was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazo lium (MTS) assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). THP-1 macrophages were exposed to (A) A50; (B) A100; (C) R50; (D) R250; and (E) P25 at concentrations ranging from 1 to 50 µg/mL for 24 h. Data are mean ± SD of six experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control (0 µg/mL). ** p < 0.01 vs. control (0 µg/mL).
Figure 3Cytotoxic effects of dispersed TiO2 particles on Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were exposed to (A) A50; (B) A100; (C) R50; (D) R250; and (E) P25 at concentrations ranging from 1 to 50 µg/mL for 24 h. Data are mean ± SD of six experiments.
Figure 4Cytotoxic effects of dispersed TiO2 particles on Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were exposed to (A) A50; (B) A100; (C) R50; (D) R250; and (E) P25 at concentrations ranging from 1 to 50 µg/mL for 72 h. Data are mean ± SD of six experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control (0 µg/mL). ** p < 0.01 vs. control (0 µg/mL).
Figure 5Effects of exposure of (A) THP-1 macrophages and (B) Caco-2 cells to dispersed TiO2 particles (concentration: 25 and 50 µg/mL, for 3 h) on ROS production. Data are mean ± SD of four experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control (0 µg/mL). ** p < 0.01 vs. control (0 µg/mL).
Figure 6Effects of exposure of THP-1 macrophages to various TiO2 particles (concentration: 1–50 µg/mL for 24 h) on IL-1β production. Data are mean ± SD of three or four experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control (0 µg/mL).
Figure 7Effects of exposure of Caco-2 cells to various TiO2 particles (concentration: 25 and 50 µg/mL for 6 h) on IL-8 mRNA expression level. Data are mean ± SD of four experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control (0 µg/mL).