Literature DB >> 14964707

Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.

Margaret A McDevitt1, Ben A Williams.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on multiple schedules that provided concurrent reinforcement in each of two components. In Experiment 1, one component consisted of a variable-interval (VI) 40-s schedule presented with a VI 20-s schedule, and the other a VI 40-s schedule presented with a VI 80-s schedule. After extended training, probe tests measured preference between the stimuli associated with the two 40-s schedules. Probe tests replicated the results of Belke (1992) that showed preference for the 40-s schedule that had been paired with the 80-s schedule. In a second condition, the overall reinforcer rate provided by the two components was equated by adding a signaled VI schedule to the component with the lower reinforcer rate. Probe results were unchanged. In Experiment 2, pigeons were trained on alternating concurrent VI 30-s VI 60-s schedules. One schedule provided 2-s access to food and the other provided 6-s access. The larger reinforcer magnitude produced higher response rates and was preferred on probe trials. Rate of changeover responding, however, did not differ as a function of reinforcer magnitude. The present results demonstrate that preference on probe trials is not a simple reflection of the pattern of changeover behavior established during training.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14964707      PMCID: PMC1284959          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference after training with differential changeover delays.

Authors:  B Williams; M Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A P McLean; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Scalar expectancy theory and choice between delayed rewards.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R M Church; S Fairhurst; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Kinetics of matching.

Authors:  T A Mark; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Independence of terminal-link entry rate and immediacy in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Mark E Berg; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Resistance to extinction and relapse in combined stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; John Y H Bai; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.