Literature DB >> 27087574

Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Lesly A Dossett1, Janell Lowe1, Weihong Sun1, M C Lee1, Paul D Smith1,2, Paul B Jacobsen3, Christine Laronga1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensation and quality of life (QOL) before and after nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) are poorly understood.
METHODS: Women electing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and eligible for NSM were prospectively enrolled in a sensation and satisfaction/QOL study. Women self-selected skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or NSM. Skin sensation testing using Semmes Weinstein monofilaments and patient satisfaction/QOL surveys were administered preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: 53 patients were enrolled (n = 38, 72% NSM and n = 15, 28% SSM). Both groups had significant reduction in postoperative skin sensation. For NSM, measurable NAC sensation was preserved in both NAC for 26% of patients and in one NAC for 68%. QOL and satisfaction was similar between groups. Neither group was satisfied with sexual arousal with breast or nipple stimulation after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing SSM and NSM have considerable loss in skin and NAC sensation following surgery. Satisfaction and QOL did not differ between groups. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:11-16.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; nipple sensation; nipple-sparing mastectomy; outcomes; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27087574      PMCID: PMC7771573          DOI: 10.1002/jso.24264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  21 in total

Review 1.  Defining a place for nipple sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence based review.

Authors:  Vijayashree Murthy; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 2.  Update on the indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2006-05

3.  Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex.

Authors:  Aaron G Margulies; Julio Hochberg; Julie Kepple; Ronda S Henry-Tillman; Kent Westbrook; V Suzanne Klimberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.

Authors:  Yeliz Cemal; Claudia R Albornoz; Joseph J Disa; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Nipple-areola complex cutaneous sensitivity: a systematic approach to classification and breast volume.

Authors:  Benedetto Longo; Antonella Campanale; Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne Warren Peled; Erin Duralde; Robert D Foster; Allison Stover Fiscalini; Laura J Esserman; E Shelley Hwang; Hani Sbitany
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 7.  Breast sensation after breast reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sachin M Shridharani; Michael Magarakis; Sahael M Stapleton; Basak Basdag; Stella M Seal; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.873

8.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): A new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jean Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Roberto Orecchia; Alberto Luini; Piercarlo Rey; Mattia Intra; Florence Didier; Stefano Martella; Mario Rietjens; Cristina Garusi; Francesca DeLorenzi; Giovanna Gatti; Maria Elena Leon; Chiara Casadio
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

Authors:  Virgilio Sacchini; José A Pinotti; Alfredo C S D Barros; Alberto Luini; Alfonso Pluchinotta; Marianne Pinotti; Marcelo G Boratto; Marco D Ricci; Carlos A Ruiz; Antonio C Nisida; Paolo Veronesi; Jean Petit; Paolo Arnone; Fabio Bassi; Joseph J Disa; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Michael A Howard; Mark Sisco; Katharine Yao; David J Winchester; Ermilo Barrera; Jeremy Warner; Jennifer Jaffe; Peter Hulick; Kristine Kuchta; Andrea L Pusic; Stephen F Sener
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Carrie K Chu; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Sebastian J Winocour; Albert Losken; Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  The altering in sensory sensitivity: a current issue of female breast surgery.

Authors:  Tong Zhu; Yi Jiang; Ting Liu; Jinqi Xue; Nan Niu; Jiawen Bu; Mingxin Liu; Caigang Liu; Xudong Zhu; Xi Gu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 5.  Prophylactic Surgery: For Whom, When and How?

Authors:  Christine Mau; Michael Untch
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Increase in Utilization of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Indications, Complications, and Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Monica G Valero; Shirin Muhsen; Tracy-Ann Moo; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Andrea Pusic; Mary L Gemignani; Monica Morrow; Virgilio S Sacchini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Evidence based outcomes of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Registry.

Authors:  Sunny D Mitchell; Shawna C Willey; Peter Beitsch; Sheldon Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

8.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used for Assessing Breast Sensation after Mastectomy: Not Fit for Purpose.

Authors:  Hansje P Smeele; Rachel C H Dijkstra; Merel L Kimman; René R W J van der Hulst; Stefania M H Tuinder
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Immediate Targeted Nipple-Areolar Complex Reinnervation: Improving Outcomes in Gender-affirming Mastectomy.

Authors:  Danielle H Rochlin; Phil Brazio; Irene Wapnir; Dung Nguyen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.