Literature DB >> 24317238

Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction.

Anne Warren Peled1, Erin Duralde, Robert D Foster, Allison Stover Fiscalini, Laura J Esserman, E Shelley Hwang, Hani Sbitany.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) with preservation of the nipple-areolar complex skin has become more widely accepted. Few studies looking at outcomes after TSSM and immediate reconstruction have focused on patient-reported outcomes and trends in satisfaction over time.
METHODS: Prospective evaluation of patients undergoing TSSM and immediate expander-implant reconstruction was performed. Patients completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire preoperatively and again at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Mean scores in each BREAST-Q domain were assessed at each time point. Domains were scored on a 0- to 100-point scale.
RESULTS: Survey completion rate was 55%; BREAST-Q scores were calculated from responses from 28 patients. Mean overall satisfaction with breasts declined at 1 month (69.8 to 46.1, P<0.001), but then returned to baseline by 1 year. Mean scores also declined at 1 month in the psychosocial (75.7-67.4, P=0.2) and sexual (58.3-46.7, P=0.06) domains, but returned to baseline by 1 year. Mean nipple satisfaction score was 76.4 at 1 year, with 89% of patients reporting satisfaction with nipple appearance. Satisfaction with nipple position and sensation was lower, with only 56% of patients reporting satisfaction with nipple position and 40% with nipple sensation.
CONCLUSIONS: After TSSM and immediate reconstruction, patient satisfaction with their breasts, as well as psychosocial and sexual well-being, returns to baseline by 1 year. Although overall nipple satisfaction is high, patients often report dissatisfaction with nipple position and sensation; appropriate preoperative counseling is important to set realistic expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24317238     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  17 in total

1.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Michael A Howard; Mark Sisco; Katharine Yao; David J Winchester; Ermilo Barrera; Jeremy Warner; Jennifer Jaffe; Peter Hulick; Kristine Kuchta; Andrea L Pusic; Stephen F Sener
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristina O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Lesly A Dossett; Janell Lowe; Weihong Sun; M C Lee; Paul D Smith; Paul B Jacobsen; Christine Laronga
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  How to ask and what to do: a guide for clinical inquiry and intervention regarding female sexual health after cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Bober; Jennifer B Reese; Lisa Barbera; Andrea Bradford; Kristen M Carpenter; Shari Goldfarb; Jeanne Carter
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.302

8.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone or in Combination with a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh - A Detailed Analysis of the BREAST-Q and Overview of the Literature.

Authors:  M Dieterich; J Angres; J Stubert; A Stachs; T Reimer; B Gerber
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 9.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Mastectomy with Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anya Romanoff; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea Pusic; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.