Literature DB >> 1508621

Adaptation to auditory motion in the horizontal plane: effect of prior exposure to motion on motion detectability.

D W Grantham1.   

Abstract

Thresholds for auditory motion detectability were measured in a darkened anechoic chamber while subjects were adapted to horizontally moving sound sources of various velocities. All stimuli were 500-Hz lowpass noises presented at a level of 55 dBA. The threshold measure employed was the minimum audible movement angle (MAMA)--that is, the minimum angle a horizontally moving sound must traverse to be just discriminable from a stationary sound. In an adaptive, two-interval forced-choice procedure, trials occurred every 2-5 sec (Experiment 1) or every 10-12 sec (Experiment 2). Intertrial time was "filled" with exposure to the adaptor--a stimulus that repeatedly traversed the subject's front hemifield at ear level (distance: 1.7 m) at a constant velocity (-150 degrees/sec to +150 degrees/sec) during a run. Average MAMAs in the control condition, in which the adaptor was stationary (0 degrees/sec,) were 2.4 degrees (Experiment 1) and 3.0 degrees (Experiment 2). Three out of 4 subjects in each experiment showed significantly elevated MAMAs (by up to 60%), with some adaptors relative to the control condition. However, there were large intersubject differences in the shape of the MAMA versus adaptor velocity functions. This loss of sensitivity to motion that most subjects show after exposure to moving signals is probably one component underlying the auditory motion aftereffect (Grantham, 1989), in which judgments of the direction of moving sounds are biased in the direction opposite to that of a previously presented adaptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1508621     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity.

Authors:  D W Chandler; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Minimum audible movement angle: marking the end points of the path traveled by a moving sound source.

Authors:  D R Perrott; K Marlborough
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-02

4.  Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Individual differences in sensitivity to interaural differences in time and level.

Authors:  D McFadden; L A Jeffress; W E Russell
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1973-12

6.  Monaural-binaural minimum audible angles for a moving sound source.

Authors:  J D Harris; R L Sergeant
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-09

7.  A model for after-effects of seen movement.

Authors:  R Sekuler; A Pantle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 1.886

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Changing-loudness aftereffects: slope of response functions and spectral dependence.

Authors:  A H Reinhardt-Rutland
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1997

3.  Adaptation of firing rate and spike-timing precision in the avian cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Marina S Kuznetsova; Matthew H Higgs; William J Spain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.