Literature DB >> 2708688

Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives.

A Jongman1.   

Abstract

Natural speech consonant-vowel (CV) syllables [( f, s, theta, s, v, z, ŏ] followed by [i, u, a]) were computer edited to include 20-70 ms of their frication noise in 10-ms steps as measured from their onset, as well as the entire frication noise. These stimuli, and the entire syllables, were presented to 12 subjects for consonant identification. Results show that the listener does not require the entire fricative-vowel syllable in order to correctly perceive a fricative. The required frication duration depends on the particular fricative, ranging from approximately 30 ms for [s, z] to 50 ms for [f, s, v], while [theta, ŏ] are identified with reasonable accuracy in only the full frication and syllable conditions. Analysis in terms of the linguistic features of voicing, place, and manner of articulation revealed that fricative identification in terms of place of articulation is much more affected by a decrease in frication duration than identification in terms of voicing and manner of articulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2708688     DOI: 10.1121/1.397961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Perception of Place of Articulation for Plosives and Fricatives in Noise.

Authors:  Abeer Alwan; Jintao Jiang; Willa Chen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

2.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Locus equations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation.

Authors:  H M Sussman; J Shore
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

4.  A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Andrea Trevino; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Increasing diversity of neural responses to speech sounds across the central auditory pathway.

Authors:  K G Ranasinghe; W A Vrana; C J Matney; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Gradient perception of children's productions of /s/ and /θ/: A comparative study of rating methods.

Authors:  Sarah K Schellinger; Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 1.346

9.  Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.

Authors:  Robin Karlin; Chris Naber; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.