Literature DB >> 2708686

Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices.

I R Titze1.   

Abstract

Comparison is drawn between male and female larynges on the basis of overall size, vocal fold membranous length, elastic properties of tissue, and prephonatory glottal shape. Two scale factors are proposed that are useful for explaining differences in fundamental frequency, sound power, mean airflow, and glottal efficiency. Fundamental frequency is scaled primarily according to the membranous length of the vocal folds (scale factor of 1.6), whereas mean airflow, sound power, glottal efficiency, and amplitude of vibration include another scale factor (1.2) that relates to overall larynx size. Some explanations are given for observed sex differences in glottographic waveforms. In particular, the simulated (computer-modeled) vocal fold contact area is used to infer male-female differences in the shape of the glottis. The female glottis appears to converge more linearly (from bottom to top) than the male glottis, primarily because of medial surface bulging of the male vocal folds.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2708686     DOI: 10.1121/1.397959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  68 in total

1.  Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Jan G Svec; Peter S Popolo
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Vowel selection and its effects on perturbation and nonlinear dynamic measures.

Authors:  Julia K Maccallum; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  Characterizing vibratory kinematics in children and adults with high-speed digital imaging.

Authors:  Rita Patel; Denis Dubrovskiy; Michael Döllinger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Voice processing in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  Pascal Belin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

7.  Laryngeal and aerodynamic adjustments for voicing versus devoicing of /h/: a within-speaker study.

Authors:  Laura L Koenig; Jorge C Lucero; W Einar Mencl
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The anatomy of vocal divergence in North American Elk and European red deer.

Authors:  Roland Frey; Tobias Riede
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 1.804

10.  Age-Related Changes in Speech and Voice: Spectral and Cepstral Measures.

Authors:  Sammi Taylor; Christopher Dromey; Shawn L Nissen; Kristine Tanner; Dennis Eggett; Kim Corbin-Lewis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.