Literature DB >> 18207361

Laryngeal and aerodynamic adjustments for voicing versus devoicing of /h/: a within-speaker study.

Laura L Koenig1, Jorge C Lucero, W Einar Mencl.   

Abstract

The aim of this within-speaker case study was to explore how effectively a phonetically trained speaker could alter the likelihood of voicing around abduction, and what changes he made to do so. An American English-speaking male produced intervocalic /h/ in varying loudness and vowel contexts. When given no specific instructions about voicing (block 1), he produced almost entirely voiced /h/. He was then asked to devoice /h/ (block 2). Measures of voicing, baseline airflow, pulse amplitudes, fundamental frequency (F0), open quotient, and speed quotient were made from oral airflow signals. Subglottal pressure was estimated from intraoral pressures during /p/. In block 2, the speaker produced 70% devoiced /h/. He achieved this by making several changes associated with higher phonation threshold pressures: greater abduction degrees, lower subglottal pressures, greater longitudinal tension of the vocal folds, and altered laryngeal settings. Qualitative inspection of the DC flow contours along with correlational and principal components analyses indicated widespread changes in respiratory, laryngeal, and supralaryngeal settings, and differing interrelationships among variables. Our speaker showed tacit knowledge of the range of parameters affecting voicing. Differing relationships among variables across the two blocks support a view of phonation as a dynamic process, where speakers adjust multiple parameters, simultaneously.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18207361      PMCID: PMC4124899          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  19 in total

1.  Myoelastic-aerodynamic theory of voice production.

Authors:  J VAN DEN BERG
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1958-09

2.  Phonation thresholds as a function of laryngeal size in a two-mass model of the vocal folds.

Authors:  Jorge C Lucero; Laura L Koenig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area.

Authors:  M Rothenberg; J J Mahshie
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1988-09

4.  The physics of small-amplitude oscillation of the vocal folds.

Authors:  I R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Parameterization of the glottal area, glottal flow, and vocal fold contact area.

Authors:  I R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Initial validation of an indirect measure of subglottal pressure during vowels.

Authors:  A Löfqvist; B Carlborg; P Kitzing
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production.

Authors:  J R Smitheran; T J Hixon
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1981-05

8.  Physics of laryngeal behavior and larynx modes.

Authors:  K N Stevens
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  Simulations of temporal patterns of oral airflow in men and women using a two-mass model of the vocal folds under dynamic control.

Authors:  Jorge C Lucero; Laura L Koenig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Laryngeal factors in voiceless consonant production in men, women, and 5-year-olds.

Authors:  L L Koenig
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.