Tasuku Terada1, Ben J Wilson2, Etienne Myette-Côté1, Nicholas Kuzik1, Gordon J Bell1, Linda J McCargar3, Normand G Boulé4. 1. Faculty of Physical Education & Recreation, University of Alberta, 1-052 Li Ka Shing Center for Health Research Innovation, Physical Activity and Diabetes Laboratory, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H9. 2. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center-North Tower, 9th Floor 1403-29th Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9. 3. Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 2-012D Li Ka Shing Center for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H9. 4. Faculty of Physical Education & Recreation, University of Alberta, 1-052 Li Ka Shing Center for Health Research Innovation, Physical Activity and Diabetes Laboratory, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H9. Electronic address: nboule@ualberta.ca.
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the acute glycemic responses to a bout of high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) and energy-matched moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) performed under fasted and postprandial conditions. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, crossover design was used. Ten individuals with type 2 diabetes were each tested in five experimental conditions after an overnight fast: 1) fasted-state HIIE (HIIEfast); 2) post-breakfast HIIE (HIIEfed); 3) fasted-state MICE (MICEfast); 4) post-breakfast MICE (MICEfed); and 5) no exercise (control). MICE was performed at workload corresponding to 55% of V.V̇O2peak, whereas HIIE was composed of repetitions of three minutes at workload corresponding to 40% followed by one minute at workload corresponding to 100% V.V̇̇O2peak. Interstitial glucose was monitored by continuous glucose monitoring over 24h under standardized diet and medication. RESULTS:Fasted-state exercise attenuated postprandial glycemic increments (p<0.05) to a greater extent than post-breakfast exercise did. HIIE reduced nocturnal and fasting glycemia on the day following exercise more than MICE did (main effect: both p<0.05). Compared to the control condition, HIIEfast lowered most interstitial glycemic parameters, i.e., 24-h mean glucose (-1.5mmol·l(-1); p<0.05), fasting glucose (-1.0mmol·l(-1); p<0.05), overall postprandial glycemic increment (-257mmol·360min·l(-1); p<0.05), glycemic variability (-1.79mmol·l(-1); p<0.05), and time spent in hyperglycemia (-283min; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that HIIE is more effective than MICE in lowering nocturnal/fasting glycemia. Exercise performed in the fasted state reduces postprandial glycemic increments to a greater extent than post-breakfast exercise does. Performing HIIE under fasted condition may be most advantageous as it lowered most aspects of glycemia.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To compare the acute glycemic responses to a bout of high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) and energy-matched moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) performed under fasted and postprandial conditions. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, crossover design was used. Ten individuals with type 2 diabetes were each tested in five experimental conditions after an overnight fast: 1) fasted-state HIIE (HIIEfast); 2) post-breakfast HIIE (HIIEfed); 3) fasted-state MICE (MICEfast); 4) post-breakfast MICE (MICEfed); and 5) no exercise (control). MICE was performed at workload corresponding to 55% of V.V̇O2peak, whereas HIIE was composed of repetitions of three minutes at workload corresponding to 40% followed by one minute at workload corresponding to 100% V.V̇̇O2peak. Interstitial glucose was monitored by continuous glucose monitoring over 24h under standardized diet and medication. RESULTS: Fasted-state exercise attenuated postprandial glycemic increments (p<0.05) to a greater extent than post-breakfast exercise did. HIIE reduced nocturnal and fasting glycemia on the day following exercise more than MICE did (main effect: both p<0.05). Compared to the control condition, HIIEfast lowered most interstitial glycemic parameters, i.e., 24-h mean glucose (-1.5mmol·l(-1); p<0.05), fasting glucose (-1.0mmol·l(-1); p<0.05), overall postprandial glycemic increment (-257mmol·360min·l(-1); p<0.05), glycemic variability (-1.79mmol·l(-1); p<0.05), and time spent in hyperglycemia (-283min; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that HIIE is more effective than MICE in lowering nocturnal/fasting glycemia. Exercise performed in the fasted state reduces postprandial glycemic increments to a greater extent than post-breakfast exercise does. Performing HIIE under fasted condition may be most advantageous as it lowered most aspects of glycemia.
Authors: Håvard Nygaard; Bent R Rønnestad; Daniel Hammarström; Gerd Holmboe-Ottesen; Arne T Høstmark Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Jill A Kanaley; Sheri R Colberg; Matthew H Corcoran; Steven K Malin; Nancy R Rodriguez; Carlos J Crespo; John P Kirwan; Juleen R Zierath Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Gabriela de Oliveira Teles; Carini Silva da Silva; Vinicius Ramos Rezende; Ana Cristina Silva Rebelo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Massimo Sacchetti; Jonida Haxhi; Paolo Sgrò; Alessandro Scotto di Palumbo; Andrea Nicolò; Alessio Bellini; Ilenia Bazzucchi; Luigi di Luigi Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 5.614