Mark G Orr1, George A Kaplan2, Sandro Galea3. 1. Biocomplexity Institute of Virginia Tech, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, Virginia, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. Dean of Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple approaches that can contribute to reducing obesity have been proposed. These policies may share overlapping pathways, and may have unanticipated consequences, creating considerable complexity. Aiming to illuminate the use of agent-based models to explore the consequences of key policies, this paper simulates the effects of increasing neighbourhood availability of good food stores, physical activity infrastructure and higher school quality on the reduction of black/white disparities in body mass index (BMI) in the USA. METHODS: We used an agent-based model, with parameters derived from the empirical literature, which included individual and neighbourhood characteristics over the life course as determinants of behaviours thought to impact BMI. We systematically varied the strength of the 3 policy interventions, examining the impact of 125 different policy scenarios on black/white BMI disparities. RESULTS: In the absence of any of these policies, black/white BMI disparities generally increased over time. However, we found that some combinations of these policies resulted in reductions in BMI, yielding decreases in the black/white BMI disparity as large as a 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Within the structure of relationships captured in this simulation model, there is support for the further use of agent-based simulation models to explore upstream policies as plausible candidates for the reduction of black/white disparities in BMI. These results highlight the potential insights into important public health problems, such as obesity, that can come from uniting the systems science approach with policy analysis. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND: Multiple approaches that can contribute to reducing obesity have been proposed. These policies may share overlapping pathways, and may have unanticipated consequences, creating considerable complexity. Aiming to illuminate the use of agent-based models to explore the consequences of key policies, this paper simulates the effects of increasing neighbourhood availability of good food stores, physical activity infrastructure and higher school quality on the reduction of black/white disparities in body mass index (BMI) in the USA. METHODS: We used an agent-based model, with parameters derived from the empirical literature, which included individual and neighbourhood characteristics over the life course as determinants of behaviours thought to impact BMI. We systematically varied the strength of the 3 policy interventions, examining the impact of 125 different policy scenarios on black/white BMI disparities. RESULTS: In the absence of any of these policies, black/white BMI disparities generally increased over time. However, we found that some combinations of these policies resulted in reductions in BMI, yielding decreases in the black/white BMI disparity as large as a 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Within the structure of relationships captured in this simulation model, there is support for the further use of agent-based simulation models to explore upstream policies as plausible candidates for the reduction of black/white disparities in BMI. These results highlight the potential insights into important public health problems, such as obesity, that can come from uniting the systems science approach with policy analysis. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Entities:
Keywords:
EDUCATION; OBESITY; PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Sarah M Bartsch; Yeeli Mui; Leila A Haidari; Marie L Spiker; Joel Gittelsohn Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Jessie-Lee D McIsaac; Rebecca Spencer; Melissa Stewart; Tarra Penney; Sara Brushett; Sara F L Kirk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Leah Frerichs; Natalie R Smith; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Todd K BenDor; Kelly R Evenson Journal: Health Place Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Brent A Langellier; Usama Bilal; Felipe Montes; Jose D Meisel; Letícia de Oliveira Cardoso; Ross A Hammond Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Paul Brewster; Lisa Barnes; Mary Haan; Julene K Johnson; Jennifer J Manly; Anna María Nápoles; Rachel A Whitmer; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Dawnte Early; Sarah Farias; Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; Rebecca Melrose; Oanh L Meyer; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri; Ladson Hinton; Dan Mungas Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Jason M Nagata; Eric Vittinghoff; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Andrea K Garber; Andrew E Moran; Stephen Sidney; Jamal S Rana; Jared P Reis; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: Mary O Hearst; Jade Yang; Samantha Friedrichsen; Kathleen Lenk; Caitlin Caspi; Melissa N Laska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 3.390