| Literature DB >> 27082737 |
Gemma Cripps1, Kevin J Flynn2, Penelope K Lindeque3.
Abstract
The critical role played by copepods in ocean ecology and biogeochemistry warrants an understanding of how these animals may respond to ocean acidification (OA). Whilst an appreciation of the potential direct effects of OA, due to elevated pCO2, on copepods is improving, little is known about the indirect impacts acEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27082737 PMCID: PMC4833293 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Biochemical stoichiometry of phytoplankton prey (A, B) and adult predator copepods (C, D) upon exposure to 4 different OA treatments. A: The lipid: protein ratio of C. muelleri reared at ambient (PL) and elevated (PE) pCO2 levels. B: The lipid: protein, lipid: carbohydrate and protein: carbohydrate ratio of I. galbana reared at ambient and elevated pCO2 levels. Stars denote significance differences between the 2 treatments: *** = p < 0.001, ** = p < 0.01 and * = p < 0.05. C: Multi-dimensional ordinal scale (nMDS) plot representing the ordinal distance between the biochemical stoichiometry of A. tonsa adult populations exposed to 4 different pCO2 treatments for one-life cycle (ZLPL = both plankton prey and copepod predators reared under ambient pCO2 levels, ZEPL: prey reared under ambient pCO2 levels and predators reared under elevated levels, ZLPE: prey reared under elevated pCO2 levels and predators reared under ambient levels, and ZEPE: both prey and predator reared under elevated pCO2 levels). D: The variation in biochemical ratios across the four pCO2 treatments in adult Acartia tonsa. Letters denote significant difference between the 4 treatments within each group (biochemical ratio). Columns that do not share the same letter are significantly different from one another. The integrated band ratios assigned for each biochemical group are detailed in S1 Table. Corresponding pCO2 treatment concentrations are detailed in S2 Table. Values are average ± 1SE across all graphs.
Fig 2Prey selection and ingestion rates of adult Acartia tonsa exposed to 4 different OA treatments for one-life cycle.
A, C: Prey selectivity (% of α-index) of adult females and males (respectively). B, D: Female and male ingestion rates of I. galbana (I), C. muelleri (C) and T. suecica (T). Letters denote significant difference between the 4 treatments within each group (i.e., male and female). Columns that do not share the same letter are significantly different from one another. Corresponding pCO2 treatment concentrations are detailed in S2 Table.
Fig 3Vital rates of Acartia tonsa exposed to 4 different OA treatments after one-life cycle of exposure.
A: Respiration rates of adult males and females, B: Nauplii recruitment per adult female. Letters denote significant difference between the 4 treatments within each group (i.e., male and female). Columns that do not share the same letter are significantly different from one another. Corresponding pCO2 treatment concentrations are detailed in S2 Table.