Literature DB >> 28148830

Does sex really matter? Explaining intraspecies variation in ocean acidification responses.

Robert P Ellis1, William Davison2, Ana M Queirós3, Kristy J Kroeker4, Piero Calosi5, Sam Dupont6, John I Spicer7, Rod W Wilson2, Steve Widdicombe3, Mauricio A Urbina8.   

Abstract

Ocean acidification (OA) poses a major threat to marine ecosystems globally, having significant ecological and economic importance. The number and complexity of experiments examining the effects of OA has substantially increased over the past decade, in an attempt to address multi-stressor interactions and long-term responses in an increasing range of aquatic organisms. However, differences in the response of males and females to elevated pCO2 have been investigated in fewer than 4% of studies to date, often being precluded by the difficulty of determining sex non-destructively, particularly in early life stages. Here we highlight that sex can significantly impact organism responses to OA, differentially affecting physiology, reproduction, biochemistry and ultimately survival. What is more, these impacts do not always conform to ecological theory based on differential resource allocation towards reproduction, which would predict females to be more sensitive to OA owing to the higher production cost of eggs compared with sperm. Therefore, non-sex-specific studies may overlook subtle but ecologically significant differences in the responses of males and females to OA, with consequences for forecasting the fate of natural populations in a near-future ocean.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide; climate change; gender; hermaphroditism; individual variation; systematic map

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148830      PMCID: PMC5326506          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  13 in total

Review 1.  Does gender really matter in contaminant exposure? A case study using invertebrate models.

Authors:  Patricia McClellan-Green; Jocelyn Romano; Eva Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  (1)H NMR metabolomics reveals contrasting response by male and female mussels exposed to reduced seawater pH, increased temperature, and a pathogen.

Authors:  Robert P Ellis; John I Spicer; Jonathan J Byrne; Ulf Sommer; Mark R Viant; Daniel A White; Steve Widdicombe
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Biological responses to environmental heterogeneity under future ocean conditions.

Authors:  Philip W Boyd; Christopher E Cornwall; Andrew Davison; Scott C Doney; Marion Fourquez; Catriona L Hurd; Ivan D Lima; Andrew McMinn
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Solutions for ecosystem-level protection of ocean systems under climate change.

Authors:  Ana M Queirós; Klaus B Huebert; Friedemann Keyl; Jose A Fernandes; Willem Stolte; Marie Maar; Susan Kay; Miranda C Jones; Katell G Hamon; Gerrit Hendriksen; Youen Vermard; Paul Marchal; Lorna R Teal; Paul J Somerfield; Melanie C Austen; Manuel Barange; Anne F Sell; Icarus Allen; Myron A Peck
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Genetic sex determination, gender identification and pseudohermaphroditism in the knobbed whelk, Busycon carica (Mollusca: Melongenidae).

Authors:  John C Avise; Alan J Power; DeEtte Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Multiple physiological responses to multiple environmental challenges: an individual approach.

Authors:  P Calosi; L M Turner; M Hawkins; C Bertolini; G Nightingale; M Truebano; J I Spicer
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Trans-generational responses to low pH depend on parental gender in a calcifying tubeworm.

Authors:  Ackley Lane; Camilla Campanati; Sam Dupont; Vengatesen Thiyagarajan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it?

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Judith E Mank; Catherine L Peichel; Mark Kirkpatrick; Sarah P Otto; Tia-Lynn Ashman; Matthew W Hahn; Jun Kitano; Itay Mayrose; Ray Ming; Nicolas Perrin; Laura Ross; Nicole Valenzuela; Jana C Vamosi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Ocean Acidification Affects the Phyto-Zoo Plankton Trophic Transfer Efficiency.

Authors:  Gemma Cripps; Kevin J Flynn; Penelope K Lindeque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming.

Authors:  Kristy J Kroeker; Rebecca L Kordas; Ryan Crim; Iris E Hendriks; Laura Ramajo; Gerald S Singh; Carlos M Duarte; Jean-Pierre Gattuso
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Robert P Ellis; Friederike Eyssel; James Zou; Londa Schiebinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  New perspectives in ocean acidification research: editor's introduction to the special feature on ocean acidification.

Authors:  Philip L Munday
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Ocean acidification but not warming alters sex determination in the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata.

Authors:  Laura M Parker; Wayne A O'Connor; Maria Byrne; Michael Dove; Ross A Coleman; Hans-O Pörtner; Elliot Scanes; Patti Virtue; Mitchell Gibbs; Pauline M Ross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on male and female behavioural lateralization in a temperate goby.

Authors:  Josefin Sundin; Fredrik Jutfelt
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Ocean acidification boosts reproduction in fish via indirect effects.

Authors:  Ivan Nagelkerken; Tiphaine Alemany; Julie M Anquetin; Camilo M Ferreira; Kim E Ludwig; Minami Sasaki; Sean D Connell
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Molecular basis of parental contributions to the behavioural tolerance of elevated pCO2 in a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Alison A Monroe; Celia Schunter; Megan J Welch; Philip L Munday; Timothy Ravasi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.