Michael W Temple1, Christoph U Lehmann2, Daniel Fabbri1. 1. Department of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University , Nashville, TN. 2. Department of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Pediatrics Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Discharging patients from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) can be delayed for non-medical reasons including the procurement of home medical equipment, parental education, and the need for children's services. We previously created a model to identify patients that will be medically ready for discharge in the subsequent 2-10 days. In this study we use Natural Language Processing to improve upon that model and discern why the model performed poorly on certain patients. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the text of the Assessment and Plan section from daily progress notes of 4,693 patients (103,206 patient-days) from the NICU of a large, academic children's hospital. A matrix was constructed using words from NICU notes (single words and bigrams) to train a supervised machine learning algorithm to determine the most important words differentiating poorly performing patients compared to well performing patients in our original discharge prediction model. RESULTS: NLP using a bag of words (BOW) analysis revealed several cohorts that performed poorly in our original model. These included patients with surgical diagnoses, pulmonary hypertension, retinopathy of prematurity, and psychosocial issues. DISCUSSION: The BOW approach aided in cohort discovery and will allow further refinement of our original discharge model prediction. Adequately identifying patients discharged home on g-tube feeds alone could improve the AUC of our original model by 0.02. Additionally, this approach identified social issues as a major cause for delayed discharge. CONCLUSION: A BOW analysis provides a method to improve and refine our NICU discharge prediction model and could potentially avoid over 900 (0.9%) hospital days.
OBJECTIVES: Discharging patients from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) can be delayed for non-medical reasons including the procurement of home medical equipment, parental education, and the need for children's services. We previously created a model to identify patients that will be medically ready for discharge in the subsequent 2-10 days. In this study we use Natural Language Processing to improve upon that model and discern why the model performed poorly on certain patients. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the text of the Assessment and Plan section from daily progress notes of 4,693 patients (103,206 patient-days) from the NICU of a large, academic children's hospital. A matrix was constructed using words from NICU notes (single words and bigrams) to train a supervised machine learning algorithm to determine the most important words differentiating poorly performing patients compared to well performing patients in our original discharge prediction model. RESULTS: NLP using a bag of words (BOW) analysis revealed several cohorts that performed poorly in our original model. These included patients with surgical diagnoses, pulmonary hypertension, retinopathy of prematurity, and psychosocial issues. DISCUSSION: The BOW approach aided in cohort discovery and will allow further refinement of our original discharge model prediction. Adequately identifying patients discharged home on g-tube feeds alone could improve the AUC of our original model by 0.02. Additionally, this approach identified social issues as a major cause for delayed discharge. CONCLUSION: A BOW analysis provides a method to improve and refine our NICU discharge prediction model and could potentially avoid over 900 (0.9%) hospital days.
Entities:
Keywords:
Neonatal intensive care units; ROC curve; area under curve; patient discharge
Authors: Min Jiang; Yukun Chen; Mei Liu; S Trent Rosenbloom; Subramani Mani; Joshua C Denny; Hua Xu Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Wendy W Chapman; Prakash M Nadkarni; Lynette Hirschman; Leonard W D'Avolio; Guergana K Savova; Ozlem Uzuner Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Adam Wright; Allison B McCoy; Stanislav Henkin; Abhivyakti Kale; Dean F Sittig Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-03-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jonas F Ludvigsson; Jyotishman Pathak; Sean Murphy; Matthew Durski; Phillip S Kirsch; Christophe G Chute; Euijung Ryu; Joseph A Murray Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Susan R Hintz; Carla M Bann; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; C Michael Cotten; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jaclyn B York; Megan Z Cardoso; Dara S Azuma; Kristyn S Beam; Geoffrey G Binney; Saul N Weingart Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 2.342