Literature DB >> 27080684

Speech Coding in the Midbrain: Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Laurel H Carney1, Duck O Kim2, Shigeyuki Kuwada2.   

Abstract

In response to voiced speech sounds, auditory-nerve (AN) fibres phase-lock to harmonics near best frequency (BF) and to the fundamental frequency (F0) of voiced sounds. Due to nonlinearities in the healthy ear, phase-locking in each frequency channel is dominated either by a single harmonic, for channels tuned near formants, or by F0, for channels between formants. The alternating dominance of these factors sets up a robust pattern of F0-synchronized rate across best frequency (BF). This profile of a temporally coded measure is transformed into a mean rate profile in the midbrain (inferior colliculus, IC), where neurons are sensitive to low-frequency fluctuations. In the impaired ear, the F0-synchronized rate profile is affected by several factors: Reduced synchrony capture decreases the dominance of a single harmonic near BF on the response. Elevated thresholds also reduce the effect of rate saturation, resulting in increased F0-synchrony. Wider peripheral tuning results in a wider-band envelope with reduced F0 amplitude. In general, sensorineural hearing loss reduces the contrast in AN F0-synchronized rates across BF. Computational models for AN and IC neurons illustrate how hearing loss would affect the F0-synchronized rate profiles set up in response to voiced speech sounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Modulation transfer function; Neural coding; Vowels

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080684      PMCID: PMC5081182          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  20 in total

1.  Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

Authors:  G A Studebaker; R L Sherbecoe; D M McDaniel; C A Gwaltney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Auditory plasticity and hyperactivity following cochlear damage.

Authors:  R J Salvi; J Wang; D Ding
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Miller; J R Schilling; K R Franck; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory distance coding in rabbit midbrain neurons and human perception: monaural amplitude modulation depth as a cue.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney; Brian B Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to multiple-tone complexes.

Authors:  L Deng; C D Geisler; S Greenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; L A Getty; M J Clark; K Wheeler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Plastic changes in glycine and GABA release and uptake in adult brain stem auditory nuclei after unilateral middle ear ossicle removal and cochlear ablation.

Authors:  S K Suneja; S J Potashner; C G Benson
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  6 in total

1.  Nonlinear auditory models yield new insights into representations of vowels.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Joyce M McDonough
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Identified GABAergic and Glutamatergic Neurons in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus Share Similar Response Properties.

Authors:  Munenori Ono; Deborah C Bishop; Douglas L Oliver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Synaptopathy in Guinea Pigs Induced by Noise Mimicking Human Experience and Associated Changes in Auditory Signal Processing.

Authors:  Li Xia; Sara Ripley; Zhenhua Jiang; Xue Yin; Zhiping Yu; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 5.  Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sara Ripley; Li Xia; Zhen Zhang; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 6.  Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.