Literature DB >> 27079692

A machine-learning approach for computation of fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography.

Lucian Itu1, Saikiran Rapaka2, Tiziano Passerini3, Bogdan Georgescu3, Chris Schwemmer4, Max Schoebinger4, Thomas Flohr4, Puneet Sharma3, Dorin Comaniciu3.   

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a functional index quantifying the severity of coronary artery lesions and is clinically obtained using an invasive, catheter-based measurement. Recently, physics-based models have shown great promise in being able to noninvasively estimate FFR from patient-specific anatomical information, e.g., obtained from computed tomography scans of the heart and the coronary arteries. However, these models have high computational demand, limiting their clinical adoption. In this paper, we present a machine-learning-based model for predicting FFR as an alternative to physics-based approaches. The model is trained on a large database of synthetically generated coronary anatomies, where the target values are computed using the physics-based model. The trained model predicts FFR at each point along the centerline of the coronary tree, and its performance was assessed by comparing the predictions against physics-based computations and against invasively measured FFR for 87 patients and 125 lesions in total. Correlation between machine-learning and physics-based predictions was excellent (0.9994, P < 0.001), and no systematic bias was found in Bland-Altman analysis: mean difference was -0.00081 ± 0.0039. Invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 was found in 38 lesions out of 125 and was predicted by the machine-learning algorithm with a sensitivity of 81.6%, a specificity of 83.9%, and an accuracy of 83.2%. The correlation was 0.729 (P < 0.001). Compared with the physics-based computation, average execution time was reduced by more than 80 times, leading to near real-time assessment of FFR. Average execution time went down from 196.3 ± 78.5 s for the CFD model to ∼2.4 ± 0.44 s for the machine-learning model on a workstation with 3.4-GHz Intel i7 8-core processor.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCTA; FFR; coronary artery disease; machine learning; synthetic database

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27079692     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00752.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  78 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Piotr J Slomka; Paul Leeson; Dorin Comaniciu; Sirish Shrestha; Partho P Sengupta; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  A Distributed Lumped Parameter Model of Blood Flow.

Authors:  Mehran Mirramezani; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Physiome approach for the analysis of vascular flow reserve in the heart and brain.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Lee; Ah-Jin Ryu; Eun-Seok Shin; Eun Bo Shim
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR.

Authors:  Xiuhua Hu; Minglei Yang; Lu Han; Yujiao Du
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Diagnostic performance of perivascular fat attenuation index to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis: a preliminary coronary computed tomography angiography study.

Authors:  Mengmeng Yu; Xu Dai; Jianhong Deng; Zhigang Lu; Chengxing Shen; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A deep learning approach to estimate stress distribution: a fast and accurate surrogate of finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Minliang Liu; Caitlin Martin; Wei Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  A Re-Engineered Software Interface and Workflow for the Open-Source SimVascular Cardiovascular Modeling Package.

Authors:  Hongzhi Lan; Adam Updegrove; Nathan M Wilson; Gabriel D Maher; Shawn C Shadden; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Sara Gaur; Kristian A Ovrehus; Piotr J Slomka; Julian Betancur; Markus Goeller; Michaela M Hell; Heidi Gransar; Daniel S Berman; Stephan Achenbach; Hans Erik Botker; Jesper Moller Jensen; Jens Flensted Lassen; Bjarne Linde Norgaard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Simultaneous evaluation of plaque stability and ischemic potential of coronary lesions in a fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Xinlei Wu; Clemens von Birgelen; Su Zhang; Daixin Ding; Jiayue Huang; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  The value of noninvasive computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve in our current approach to the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.