Literature DB >> 27079531

Typicality sharpens category representations in object-selective cortex.

Marius Cătălin Iordan1, Michelle R Greene2, Diane M Beck3, Li Fei-Fei4.   

Abstract

The purpose of categorization is to identify generalizable classes of objects whose members can be treated equivalently. Within a category, however, some exemplars are more representative of that concept than others. Despite long-standing behavioral effects, little is known about how typicality influences the neural representation of real-world objects from the same category. Using fMRI, we showed participants 64 subordinate object categories (exemplars) grouped into 8 basic categories. Typicality for each exemplar was assessed behaviorally and we used several multi-voxel pattern analyses to characterize how typicality affects the pattern of responses elicited in early visual and object-selective areas: V1, V2, V3v, hV4, LOC. We found that in LOC, but not in early areas, typical exemplars elicited activity more similar to the central category tendency and created sharper category boundaries than less typical exemplars, suggesting that typicality enhances within-category similarity and between-category dissimilarity. Additionally, we uncovered a brain region (cIPL) where category boundaries favor less typical categories. Our results suggest that typicality may constitute a previously unexplored principle of organization for intra-category neural structure and, furthermore, that this representation is not directly reflected in image features describing natural input, but rather built by the visual system at an intermediate processing stage.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Object; Typicality; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27079531      PMCID: PMC4912889          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  58 in total

1.  Complementary category learning systems identified using event-related functional MRI.

Authors:  H J Aizenstein; A W MacDonald; V A Stenger; R D Nebes; J K Larson; S Ursu; C S Carter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Igor V Bondar; Martin A Giese
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Associations evoked during memory encoding recruit the context-network.

Authors:  Jan Peters; Irene Daum; Elke Gizewski; Michael Forsting; Boris Suchan
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Karen F LaRocque; Jeanette A Mumford; Kenneth A Norman; Anthony D Wagner; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L K Yamins; Ha Hong; Charles F Cadieu; Ethan A Solomon; Darren Seibert; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  N Sigala; F Gabbiani; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Neural Mechanism of Social Categorization.

Authors:  Ryan M Stolier; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Similarity judgments and cortical visual responses reflect different properties of object and scene categories in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Marcie L King; Iris I A Groen; Adam Steel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Representation of semantic typicality in brain activation in healthy adults and individuals with aphasia: A multi-voxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Ran Li; Tyler K Perrachione; Jason A Tourville; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.054

4.  Relating categorization to set summary statistics perception.

Authors:  Noam Khayat; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The mechanism of filler items in the response time concealed information test.

Authors:  Gáspár Lukács; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.