| Literature DB >> 27078858 |
Qi Qi1, Timothy Pok Chi Yeung1,2, Ting-Yim Lee1,2,3,4,5, Glenn Bauman1,5,6, Cathie Crukley2, Laura Morrison3, Lisa Hoffman1,3,7, Slav Yartsev1,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor hypoxia is associated with treatment resistance to cancer therapies. Hypoxia can be investigated by immunohistopathologic methods but such procedure is invasive. A non-invasive method to interrogate tumor hypoxia is an attractive option as such method can provide information before, during, and after treatment for personalized therapies. Our study evaluated the correlations between computed tomography (CT) perfusion parameters and immunohistopathologic measurement of tumor hypoxia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27078858 PMCID: PMC4831843 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Delineation of tumor and CT perfusion data.
(a) Tumor. (b) Tumor blood flow (BF). (c) Tumor blood volume (BV). (d) Tumor permeability-surface area (PS) product.
Fig 2Examples of brain histology with pimonidazole.
(a) 5 μm thick brain specimen stained for hypoxia (red arrows). (b) Zoomed area around the tumour (orange outline), pimonidazole-positive area (green outline), and necrotic area (red dashed line).
Fig 3Tumor volume vs. time for animals in (a) control, (b) SRS1, and (c) SRS2 groups.
Summary of histological results.
| Group | Number of rats | Positive staining | Tumor present |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 18 | 13 | 13 |
| SRS1 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| SRS2 | 13 | 7 | 3 |
Fig 4Examples of pimonidazole staining patterns.
(a) Pimonidazole staining (red arrows) on the periphery of necrotic regions (red asterisk). (b) Pimonidazole staining located in the center of the tumor when there is no dominant necrotic region.
Fig 5Location of the tumor (red arrows) observed in CT perfusion imaging and in histology.
Spearman’s rank correlations between CT perfusion parameters and histology measurement for control group (N = 18) animals.
| % Hypoxic area | % Necrotic area | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ρ | ρ | |||
| BF (ml/min/100g) | -0.88 | < 0.001 | -0.78 | < 0.001 |
| Tumor volume (mm3) | 0.65 | 0.017 | 0.81 | < 0.001 |
| BV (ml/100g) | -0.81 | < 0.001 | -0.64 | 0.019 |
| PS (ml/min/100g) | -0.12 | 0.694 | -0.12 | 0.699 |
Fig 6Correlation between CT perfusion parameters with hypoxia and necrosis.
Percent hypoxic area vs. tumor blood flow (a), blood volume (b), percent necrotic area vs. tumor blood flow (c) and percent necrotic area vs. blood volume (d). Data for animals in control (●), SRS1(○) and SRS2(+) groups are all included. Solid lines show the best fit and dotted lines denote the 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 7Tumor volume vs. tumor blood flow for test subjects from control (●), SRS1(○) and SRS2(+) groups.