Literature DB >> 27075537

Dissociating vestibular and somatosensory contributions to spatial orientation.

Bart B G T Alberts1, Luc P J Selen2, Giovanni Bertolini3, Dominik Straumann3, W Pieter Medendorp2, Alexander A Tarnutzer3.   

Abstract

Inferring object orientation in the surroundings heavily depends on our internal sense of direction of gravity. Previous research showed that this sense is based on the integration of multiple information sources, including visual, vestibular (otolithic), and somatosensory signals. The individual noise characteristics and contributions of these sensors can be studied using spatial orientation tasks, such as the subjective visual vertical (SVV) task. A recent study reported that patients with complete bilateral vestibular loss perform similar as healthy controls on these tasks, from which it was conjectured that the noise levels of both otoliths and body somatosensors are roll-tilt dependent. Here, we tested this hypothesis in 10 healthy human subjects by roll tilting the head relative to the body to dissociate tilt-angle dependencies of otolith and somatosensory noise. Using a psychometric approach, we measured the perceived orientation, and its variability, of a briefly flashed line relative to the gravitational vertical (SVV). Measurements were taken at multiple body-in-space orientations (-90 to 90°, steps of 30°) and head-on-body roll tilts (30° left ear down, aligned, 30° right ear down). Results showed that verticality perception is processed in a head-in-space reference frame, with a systematic SVV error that increased with larger head-in-space orientations. Variability patterns indicated a larger contribution of the otolith organs around upright and a more substantial contribution of the body somatosensors at larger body-in-space roll tilts. Simulations show that these findings are consistent with a statistical model that involves tilt-dependent noise levels of both otolith and somatosensory signals, confirming dynamic shifts in the weights of sensory inputs with tilt angle.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  internal models; multisensory integration; vertical perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27075537      PMCID: PMC4961747          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00056.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  The role of somatosensory input for the perception of verticality.

Authors:  D Anastasopoulos; A Bronstein; T Haslwanter; M Fetter; J Dichgans
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; W P Medendorp; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt.

Authors:  Ronald G Kaptein; Jan A M Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Contribution of tactile and interoceptive cues to the perception of the direction of gravity.

Authors:  Marion Trousselard; Pierre-alain Barraud; Vincent Nougier; Christian Raphel; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-08

6.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

7.  Somatic graviception.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1996-01-05       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 8.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Marion Trousselard; Corinne Cian; Vincent Nougier; Simon Pla; Christian Raphel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-11

10.  What Silly Postures Tell Us about the Brain.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  18 in total

1.  Age-related reweighting of visual and vestibular cues for vertical perception.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Bayesian optimal adaptation explains age-related human sensorimotor changes.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Gregory T Whitman; Richard F Lewis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neck muscle spindle noise biases reaches in a multisensory integration task.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Psychophysical Haptic Measurement of Vertical Perception: Elucidating a Hand Sensory Bias.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Jorge Otero-Millan; Jing Tian; Amir Kheradmand
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Subjective visual vertical imprecision during lateral head tilt in patients with chronic dizziness.

Authors:  Ariel A Winnick; Chia-Han Wang; Yu-Hung Ko; Tzu-Pu Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Gravity estimation and verticality perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

8.  Test-retest reliability of subjective visual vertical measurements with lateral head tilt in virtual reality goggles.

Authors:  Chia-Han Wang; Ariel A Winnick; Yu-Hung Ko; Zheyu Wang; Tzu-Pu Chang
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 9.  Vestibular Precision at the Level of Perception, Eye Movements, Posture, and Neurons.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Impact of gravity on the perception of linear motion.

Authors:  Megan J Kobel; Andrew R Wagner; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.