Literature DB >> 29118202

Bayesian optimal adaptation explains age-related human sensorimotor changes.

Faisal Karmali1,2, Gregory T Whitman2,3, Richard F Lewis1,2,4.   

Abstract

The brain uses information from different sensory systems to guide motor behavior, and aging is associated with simultaneous decline in the quality of sensory information provided to the brain and deterioration in motor control. Correlations between age-dependent decline in sensory anatomical structures and behavior have been demonstrated in many sensorimotor systems, and it has recently been suggested that a Bayesian framework could explain these relationships. Here we show that age-dependent changes in a human sensorimotor reflex, the vestibuloocular reflex, are explained by a Bayesian optimal adaptation in the brain occurring in response to death of motion-sensing hair cells. Specifically, we found that the temporal dynamics of the reflex as a function of age emerge from ( r = 0.93, P < 0.001) a Kalman filter model that determines the optimal behavioral output when the sensory signal-to-noise characteristics are degraded by death of the transducers. These findings demonstrate that the aging brain is capable of generating the ideal and statistically optimal behavioral response when provided with deteriorating sensory information. While the Bayesian framework has been shown to be a general neural principle for multimodal sensory integration and dynamic sensory estimation, these findings provide evidence of longitudinal Bayesian processing over the human life span. These results illuminate how the aging brain strives to optimize motor behavior when faced with deterioration in the peripheral and central nervous systems and have implications in the field of vestibular and balance disorders, as they will likely provide guidance for physical therapy and for prosthetic aids that aim to reduce falls in the elderly. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY We showed that age-dependent changes in the vestibuloocular reflex are explained by a Bayesian optimal adaptation in the brain that occurs in response to age-dependent sensory anatomical changes. This demonstrates that the brain can longitudinally respond to age-related sensory loss in an ideal and statistically optimal way. This has implications for understanding and treating vestibular disorders caused by aging and provides insight into the structure-function relationship during aging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; dynamics; hair cells; human; optimal adaptation; precision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29118202      PMCID: PMC5867390          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00710.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  83 in total

1.  Adaptation of the human vestibuloocular reflex to magnifying lenses.

Authors:  G M Gauthier; D A Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Aasef G Shaikh; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Association of gait and balance disorders with age-related white matter changes: the LADIS study.

Authors:  H Baezner; C Blahak; A Poggesi; L Pantoni; D Inzitari; H Chabriat; T Erkinjuntti; F Fazekas; J M Ferro; P Langhorne; J O'Brien; P Scheltens; M C Visser; L O Wahlund; G Waldemar; A Wallin; M G Hennerici
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Recovery of semicircular canal primary afferent activity in the pigeon after streptomycin ototoxicity.

Authors:  W Li; M J Correia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Inference of perceptual priors from path dynamics of passive self-motion.

Authors:  Mario Prsa; Danilo Jimenez-Rezende; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Free-energy and the brain.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 2.908

9.  Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; John P Carey; Charles C Della Santina; Michael C Schubert; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-25

10.  Inverse U-shaped curve for age dependency of torsional eye movement responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Klaus Jahn; Andrea Naessl; Erich Schneider; Michael Strupp; Thomas Brandt; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  20 in total

1.  Age-related reweighting of visual and vestibular cues for vertical perception.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Vestibular processing during natural self-motion: implications for perception and action.

Authors:  Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  How Peripheral Vestibular Damage Affects Velocity Storage: a Causative Explanation.

Authors:  Amsal Madhani; Richard F Lewis; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-29

4.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Human manual control precision depends on vestibular sensory precision and gravitational magnitude.

Authors:  Marissa J Rosenberg; Raquel C Galvan-Garza; Torin K Clark; David P Sherwood; Laurence R Young; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Perceptual-motor styles.

Authors:  Pierre-Paul Vidal; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 8.  Vestibular Precision at the Level of Perception, Eye Movements, Posture, and Neurons.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Persistent Visual and Vestibular Impairments for Postural Control Following Concussion: A Cross-Sectional Study in University Students.

Authors:  Jaclyn B Caccese; Fernando V Santos; Felipe K Yamaguchi; Thomas A Buckley; John J Jeka
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 11.928

10.  The velocity storage time constant: Balancing between accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.