S K Natarajan1,2, D Chua3, K Anbalakan4, V G Shelat3,4. 1. Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. nsureshkhanna2003@yahoo.co.in. 2. , 481 Yio Chu Kang Road, #03-01, Castle Green, Singapore, 787056, Singapore. nsureshkhanna2003@yahoo.co.in. 3. Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Marginal ulcer (MU) is defined as ulcer on the jejunal side of the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) anastomosis. Most MUs are managed medically but those with complications like bleeding or perforation require intervention. It is recommended that GJ anastomosis be revised in patients with MU perforation (MUP). The aim of this case series is to study the clinical presentation and management of MUP. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-two patients who underwent emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer at a single center were studied over a period of 5 years. RESULTS: Nine patients (2.7 %) presented with MUP. GJ was previously done for either complicated peptic ulcer (n = 4) or for suspected gastric malignancy (n = 5). Two patients had previously completed H. pylori therapy. None of the patients presented with septic shock. MU was on the jejunal side of GJ in all patients. The median MUP size was 10 mm. Four patients (44.4 %) had omental patch repair, three (33.3 %) had primary closure, and one each had revision of GJ and jejunal serosal patch repair. There were no leaks, intra-abdominal abscess or reoperation and no malignancies. CONCLUSION: MUP patients do not present with septic shock. Omental patch repair or primary closure is sufficient enough. Revision of Billroth-II-GJ into Roux-en-Y-GJ is not mandatory.
PURPOSE:Marginal ulcer (MU) is defined as ulcer on the jejunal side of the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) anastomosis. Most MUs are managed medically but those with complications like bleeding or perforation require intervention. It is recommended that GJ anastomosis be revised in patients with MU perforation (MUP). The aim of this case series is to study the clinical presentation and management of MUP. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-two patients who underwent emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer at a single center were studied over a period of 5 years. RESULTS: Nine patients (2.7 %) presented with MUP. GJ was previously done for either complicated peptic ulcer (n = 4) or for suspected gastric malignancy (n = 5). Two patients had previously completed H. pylori therapy. None of the patients presented with septic shock. MU was on the jejunal side of GJ in all patients. The median MUP size was 10 mm. Four patients (44.4 %) had omental patch repair, three (33.3 %) had primary closure, and one each had revision of GJ and jejunal serosal patch repair. There were no leaks, intra-abdominal abscess or reoperation and no malignancies. CONCLUSION: MUP patients do not present with septic shock. Omental patch repair or primary closure is sufficient enough. Revision of Billroth-II-GJ into Roux-en-Y-GJ is not mandatory.
Authors: Y T Lee; J J Sung; C L Choi; F K Chan; E K Ng; J Y Ching; W K Leung; S C Chung Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Mark A Malangoni; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Ewen A Griffiths; Stefano Di Bella; Lynne V McFarland; Ian Eltringham; Vishal G Shelat; George C Velmahos; Ciarán P Kelly; Sahil Khanna; Zaid M Abdelsattar; Layan Alrahmani; Luca Ansaloni; Goran Augustin; Miklosh Bala; Frédéric Barbut; Offir Ben-Ishay; Aneel Bhangu; Walter L Biffl; Stephen M Brecher; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz; Miguel A Caínzos; Laura A Canterbury; Fausto Catena; Shirley Chan; Jill R Cherry-Bukowiec; Jesse Clanton; Federico Coccolini; Maria Elena Cocuz; Raul Coimbra; Charles H Cook; Yunfeng Cui; Jacek Czepiel; Koray Das; Zaza Demetrashvili; Isidoro Di Carlo; Salomone Di Saverio; Irina Magdalena Dumitru; Catherine Eckert; Christian Eckmann; Edward H Eiland; Mushira Abdulaziz Enani; Mario Faro; Paula Ferrada; Joseph Derek Forrester; Gustavo P Fraga; Jean Louis Frossard; Rita Galeiras; Wagih Ghnnam; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Venkata Gorrepati; Mohamed Hassan Ahmed; Torsten Herzog; Felicia Humphrey; Jae Il Kim; Arda Isik; Rao Ivatury; Yeong Yeh Lee; Paul Juang; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Peter K Kim; Yoram Kluger; Wen Chien Ko; Francis D LaBarbera; Jae Gil Lee; Ari Leppaniemi; Varut Lohsiriwat; Sanjay Marwah; John E Mazuski; Gokhan Metan; Ernest E Moore; Frederick Alan Moore; Carl Erik Nord; Carlos A Ordoñez; Gerson Alves Pereira Júnior; Nicola Petrosillo; Francisco Portela; Basant K Puri; Arnab Ray; Mansoor Raza; Miran Rems; Boris E Sakakushev; Gabriele Sganga; Patrizia Spigaglia; David B Stewart; Pierre Tattevin; Jean Francois Timsit; Kathleen B To; Cristian Tranà; Waldemar Uhl; Libor Urbánek; Harry van Goor; Angela Vassallo; Jean Ralph Zahar; Emanuele Caproli; Pierluigi Viale Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 5.469