Literature DB >> 27074840

Reproducibility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Mice with Controlled Injection.

Alexandre Dizeux1, Thomas Payen2, Guillaume Barrois2, Delphine Le Guillou Buffello2, S Lori Bridal2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sensitivity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to microvascular flow modifications can be limited by intra-injection variability (injected dose, rate, volume). PROCEDURES: To evaluate the effect of injection variability on microvascular flow evaluation, CEUS was compared between controlled and manual injections where enhancement was assessed in vitro within a flow phantom, in normal murine kidney (N = 12) and in murine ectopic tumors (N = 10).
RESULTS: For both in vitro and in vivo measurements in the renal cortex, controlled injections significantly improved reproducibility of functional parameter estimation. Their coefficient of variation (CV) in the renal cortex ranged from 4 to 19 % for controlled injection vs. 5 to 43 % for manual injections. For measurements in tumors, controlled injection only decreased the CV significantly for the mean transit time. In tumors, multiple injections of contrast agent with a 15-min delay between each were shown to strongly modify contrast uptake by facilitating penetration of microbubbles.
CONCLUSION: Improved reproducibility of CEUS assessments in murine models should provide more robust quantification of flow parameters and more sensitive evaluation of tumor modifications in therapeutic models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bolus injection; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Microvascular flow; Reproducibility; SonoVue; Tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27074840     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-016-0952-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  31 in total

1.  Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves.

Authors:  Thomas P Gauthier; Michalakis A Averkiou; Edward L S Leen
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Thomas Barrack; Eleanor Stride
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications.

Authors:  F Piscaglia; C Nolsøe; C F Dietrich; D O Cosgrove; O H Gilja; M Bachmann Nielsen; T Albrecht; L Barozzi; M Bertolotto; O Catalano; M Claudon; D A Clevert; J M Correas; M D'Onofrio; F M Drudi; J Eyding; M Giovannini; M Hocke; A Ignee; E M Jung; A S Klauser; N Lassau; E Leen; G Mathis; A Saftoiu; G Seidel; P S Sidhu; G ter Haar; D Timmerman; H P Weskott
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.548

4.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.

Authors:  K Wei; A R Jayaweera; S Firoozan; A Linka; D M Skyba; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation.

Authors:  G Helmlinger; F Yuan; M Dellian; R K Jain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  Targeting the tumour vasculature: insights from physiological angiogenesis.

Authors:  Alicia S Chung; John Lee; Napoleone Ferrara
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Characteristics of SonoVuetrade mark.

Authors:  Michel Schneider
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.724

8.  Acoustic and kinetic behaviour of definity in mice exposed to high frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  Shawn Stapleton; Heather Goodman; Yu-Qing Zhou; Emmanuel Cherin; R Mark Henkelman; Peter N Burns; F Stuart Foster
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Comparison of conventional time-intensity curves vs. maximum intensity over time for post-processing of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Moritz Palmowski; Wiltrud Lederle; Jessica Gaetjens; Michaela Socher; Peter Hauff; Jessica Bzyl; Wolfhard Semmler; Rolf W Günther; Fabian Kiessling
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 10.  Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease.

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  1 in total

1.  Therapeutic response monitoring after targeted therapy in an orthotopic rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Focusing on inter-scanner, and inter-operator reproducibility.

Authors:  Hwaseong Ryu; Jung Hoon Kim; Seunghyun Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.