| Literature DB >> 27073673 |
Takashi Tsuda1, Chisato Kyomori2, Takuro Mizukami1, Tomoko Taniyama1, Naoki Izawa1, Yoshiki Horie1, Mami Hirakawa1, Takashi Ogura1, Takako Eguchi Nakajima1, Koichiro Tsugawa3, Narikazu Boku1.
Abstract
The incidences of infusion site adverse events in chemotherapy regimens, including anthracyclines with either fosaprepitant or aprepitant as the anti-emetic, were not highlighted in the randomized trial comparing aprepitant and fosaprepitant. The present retrospective analysis was performed in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, a combination of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with or without 5-fluorouracil as the adjuvant or neoadjuvant, at the outpatient infusion center of St. Marianna University Hospital (Kawasaki, Japan). Infusion site adverse events were retrospectively compared between the 3 months prior to and three months following switching from 3 day oral administration of aprepitant to intravenous infusion of fosaprepitant. A total of 62 patients were included in the aprepitant group and 38 in the fosaprepitant group. Of these patients, 26 (42%) in the aprepitant group and 36 patients (96%) in the fosaprepitant group experienced any grade of infusion site adverse events at least once (P<0.001). As an anti-emetic treatment for chemotherapy using anthracyclines, fosaprepitant may be associated with a higher risk of infusion site adverse events compared with aprepitant.Entities:
Keywords: anthracyclines; fosaprepitant; infusion site adverse events
Year: 2016 PMID: 27073673 PMCID: PMC4812534 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Clin Oncol ISSN: 2049-9450