PURPOSE: To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline for antiemetics in oncology. METHODS: A systematic review of the medical literature was completed to inform this update. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and meeting materials from ASCO and the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer were all searched. Primary outcomes of interest were complete response and rates of any vomiting or nausea. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria for this systematic review. Two systematic reviews from the Cochrane Collaboration were identified; one surveyed the pediatric literature. The other compared the relative efficacy of the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists. RECOMMENDATIONS: Combined anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimens were reclassified as highly emetic. Patients who receive this combination or any highly emetic agents should receive a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 (NK(1)) receptor antagonist. A large trial validated the equivalency of fosaprepitant, a single-day intravenous formulation, with aprepitant; either therapy is appropriate. Preferential use of palonosetron is recommended for moderate emetic risk regimens, combined with dexamethasone. For low-risk agents, patients can be offered dexamethasone before the first dose of chemotherapy. Patients undergoing high emetic risk radiation therapy should receive a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist before each fraction and for 24 hours after treatment and may receive a 5-day course of dexamethasone during fractions 1 to 5. The Update Committee noted the importance of continued symptom monitoring throughout therapy. Clinicians underestimate the incidence of nausea, which is not as well controlled as emesis.
PURPOSE: To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline for antiemetics in oncology. METHODS: A systematic review of the medical literature was completed to inform this update. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and meeting materials from ASCO and the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer were all searched. Primary outcomes of interest were complete response and rates of any vomiting or nausea. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria for this systematic review. Two systematic reviews from the Cochrane Collaboration were identified; one surveyed the pediatric literature. The other compared the relative efficacy of the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists. RECOMMENDATIONS: Combined anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimens were reclassified as highly emetic. Patients who receive this combination or any highly emetic agents should receive a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 (NK(1)) receptor antagonist. A large trial validated the equivalency of fosaprepitant, a single-day intravenous formulation, with aprepitant; either therapy is appropriate. Preferential use of palonosetron is recommended for moderate emetic risk regimens, combined with dexamethasone. For low-risk agents, patients can be offered dexamethasone before the first dose of chemotherapy. Patients undergoing high emetic risk radiation therapy should receive a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist before each fraction and for 24 hours after treatment and may receive a 5-day course of dexamethasone during fractions 1 to 5. The Update Committee noted the importance of continued symptom monitoring throughout therapy. Clinicians underestimate the incidence of nausea, which is not as well controlled as emesis.
Authors: R J Gralla; D Osoba; M G Kris; P Kirkbride; P J Hesketh; L W Chinnery; R Clark-Snow; D P Gill; S Groshen; S Grunberg; J M Koeller; G R Morrow; E A Perez; J H Silber; D G Pfister Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert S Phillips; Shireen Gopaul; Faith Gibson; Elizabeth Houghton; Jean V Craig; Kate Light; Barry Pizer Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-09-08
Authors: Ana Carolina Sepúlveda-Vildósola; Yadira Betanzos-Cabrera; Graciela Gascón Lastiri; Hugo Rivera-Márquez; Miguel Angel Villasis-Keever; Volkmar Wanzke Del Angel; Fernando Cerecedo Díaz; Enrique López-Aguilar Journal: Arch Med Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.235
Authors: D Pectasides; U Dafni; G Aravantinos; E Timotheadou; D V Skarlos; N Pavlidis; A Gaglia; H P Kalofonos; G Fountzilas Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Winnie Yeo; F K F Mo; J J S Suen; W M Ho; S L Chan; W Lau; J Koh; W K Yeung; W H Kwan; K K C Lee; T S K Mok; A N Y Poon; K C Lam; E K Hui; B Zee Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ralph V Boccia; Lucio N Gordan; Gemma Clark; Julian D Howell; Steven M Grunberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-09-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ethan Basch; Paul J Hesketh; Mark G Kris; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Sarah Temin; Gary H Lyman Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Juan Bayo; Paula J Fonseca; Susana Hernando; S Servitja; A Calvo; S Falagan; Estefanía García; Iria González; María José de Miguel; Quionia Pérez; Ana Milena; Antonio Ruiz; Agustí Barnadas Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: George Dranitsaris; Sasha Mazzarello; Stephanie Smith; Lisa Vandermeer; Nathaniel Bouganim; Mark Clemons Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: K Dennis; C De Angelis; F Jon; N Lauzon; M Pasetka; L Holden; E Barnes; C Danjoux; A Sahgal; M Tsao; E Chow Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.677