Literature DB >> 31801902

Phase IIIb Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous NEPA for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Initial and Repeat Cycles of Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Chemotherapy.

Lee Schwartzberg1, Rudolph Navari2, Rebecca Clark-Snow3, Ekaterine Arkania4, Irena Radyukova5, Kamal Patel6, Daniel Voisin7, Giada Rizzi7, Rita Wickham8, Richard J Gralla9, Matti Aapro10, Eric Roeland11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NEPA, a combination antiemetic of a neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist (RA) (netupitant [oral]/fosnetupitant [intravenous; IV]) and 5-HT3RA, palonosetron] offers 5-day CINV prevention with a single dose. Fosnetupitant solution contains no allergenic excipients, surfactant, emulsifier, or solubility enhancer. A phase III study of patients receiving cisplatin found no infusion-site or anaphylactic reactions related to IV NEPA. However, hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been reported with other IV NK1RAs, particularly fosaprepitant in patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IV NEPA in the AC setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase IIIb, multinational, randomized, double-blind study enrolled females with breast cancer naive to highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive a single 30-minute infusion of IV NEPA or single oral NEPA capsule on day 1 prior to AC, in repeated (up to 4) cycles. Oral dexamethasone was given to all patients on day 1 only.
RESULTS: A total of 402 patients were included. The adverse event (AE) profiles were similar for IV and oral NEPA and consistent with those expected. Most AEs were mild or moderate with a similarly low incidence of treatment-related AEs in both groups. There were no treatment-related injection-site AEs and no reports of hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis. The efficacy of IV and oral NEPA were similar, with high complete response (no emesis/no rescue) rates observed in cycle 1 (overall [0-120 hours] 73.0% IV NEPA, 77.3% oral NEPA) and maintained over subsequent cycles.
CONCLUSION: IV NEPA was highly effective and safe with no associated hypersensitivity and injection-site reactions in patients receiving AC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As a combination of a neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist (RA) and 5-HT3RA, NEPA offers 5-day chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prevention with a single dose and an opportunity to improve adherence to antiemetic guidelines. In this randomized multinational phase IIIb study, intravenous (IV) NEPA (fosnetupitant/palonosetron) was safe and highly effective in patients receiving multiple cycles of anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy. Unlike other IV NK1RAs, the IV NEPA combination solution does not require any surfactant, emulsifier, or solubility enhancer and contains no allergenic excipients. Hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been reported with other IV NK1RAs, most commonly with fosaprepitant in the AC setting. Importantly, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA.
© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Keywords:  Antiemetic; CINV; NEPA; Netupitant; Palonosetron

Year:  2019        PMID: 31801902     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  35 in total

1.  Fosaprepitant-induced phlebitis: a focus on patients receiving doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide therapy.

Authors:  A D Leal; K C Kadakia; S Looker; C Hilger; K Sorgatz; K Anderson; A Jacobson; D Grendahl; D Seisler; T Hobday; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  2016 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  F Roila; A Molassiotis; J Herrstedt; M Aapro; R J Gralla; E Bruera; R A Clark-Snow; L L Dupuis; L H Einhorn; P Feyer; P J Hesketh; K Jordan; I Olver; B L Rapoport; J Roscoe; C H Ruhlmann; D Walsh; D Warr; M van der Wetering
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  An analysis of fosaprepitant-induced venous toxicity in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Livia T Hegerova; Alexis D Leal; Darryl C Grendahl; Drew K Seisler; Kristine M Sorgatz; Kari J Anderson; Crystal R Hilger; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Antiemetic guideline consistency and incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in US community oncology practice: INSPIRE Study.

Authors:  James W Gilmore; Nancy W Peacock; Anna Gu; Stephen Szabo; Melissa Rammage; Joyce Sharpe; Sally T Haislip; Toni Perry; Tim L Boozan; Katherine Meador; Xiting Cao; Thomas A Burke
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Quality of life consequences of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  C M Lindley; J D Hirsch; C V O'Neill; M C Transau; C S Gilbert; J T Osterhaus
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of 5-HT(3) and NK(1) receptor antagonists in prevention of emesis.

Authors:  Camilo Rojas; Mithun Raje; Takashi Tsukamoto; Barbara S Slusher
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Infusion site adverse events in breast cancer patients receiving highly emetic chemotherapy with prophylactic anti-emetic treatment with aprepitant and fosaprepitant: A retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuda; Chisato Kyomori; Takuro Mizukami; Tomoko Taniyama; Naoki Izawa; Yoshiki Horie; Mami Hirakawa; Takashi Ogura; Takako Eguchi Nakajima; Koichiro Tsugawa; Narikazu Boku
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-05

8.  A randomized phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Aapro; H Rugo; G Rossi; G Rizzi; M E Borroni; I Bondarenko; T Sarosiek; C Oprean; S Cardona-Huerta; V Lorusso; M Karthaus; L Schwartzberg; S Grunberg
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Safety of Polysorbate 80 in the Oncology Setting.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Rudolph M Navari
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Effects of combined netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA), a cancer supportive care antiemetic, on the ECG of healthy subjects: an ICH E14 thorough QT trial.

Authors:  Tulla Spinelli; Cecilia Moresino; Sybille Baumann; Wolfgang Timmer; Armin Schultz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.