Literature DB >> 27073260

The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business.

Joyce C Harper1, Debbie Kennett2, Dan Reisel3.   

Abstract

Thousands of people worldwide have been conceived using donor gametes, but not all parents tell their children of their origin. Several countries now allow donor-conceived offspring to potentially know their genetic parent if they are informed of their donor-conceived status. At the same time, personal genetic testing is a rapidly expanding field. Over 3 million people have already used direct-to-consumer genetic testing to find information about their ancestry, and many are participating in international genetic genealogy databases that will match them with relatives. The increased prevalence of these technologies poses numerous challenges to the current practice of gamete donation. (i) Whether they are donating in a country that practices anonymous donation or not, donors should be informed that their anonymity is not guaranteed, as they may be traced if their DNA, or that of a relative, is added to a database. (ii) Donor-conceived adults who have not been informed of their status may find out that they are donor-conceived. (iii) Parents using donor conception need to be fully informed that their children's DNA will identify that they are not the biological parents and they should be encouraged to disclose the use of donor gametes to their children. Together, these concerns make urgent a wide-ranging societal conversation about how to best safeguard and promote the interests of donor-conceived offspring and protect the rights of donors. Specifically, there is a need to ensure that new genetic information is communicated in a way that promotes both the safety and the privacy rights of offspring and donors alike. All parties concerned must be aware that, in 2016, donor anonymity does not exist.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anonymity; disclosure; donor conception; gamete donation; genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27073260     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  22 in total

Review 1.  The Y chromosome as the most popular marker in genetic genealogy benefits interdisciplinary research.

Authors:  Francesc Calafell; Maarten H D Larmuseau
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics.

Authors:  Nathalie Moray; Katherina E Pink; Pascal Borry; Maarten Hd Larmuseau
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center.

Authors:  Jennifer K Blakemore; Paxton Voigt; Mindy R Schiffman; Shelley Lee; Andria G Besser; M Elizabeth Fino
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Kirby Adlam; Alana D Steffen; Martha Driessnack; Harold D Grotevant; Susan C Klock; Lauri Pasch; Valerie Gruss
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2022-07-31

5.  Singapore needs to update regulation of frozen egg donation after permitting social egg freezing.

Authors:  Alexis Heng Boon Chin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services.

Authors:  Christi J Guerrini; Jill O Robinson; Cinnamon C Bloss; Whitney Bash Brooks; Stephanie M Fullerton; Brianne Kirkpatrick; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Mary Majumder; Stacey Pereira; Olivia Schuman; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 11.043

7.  Preference for anonymity in sperm donation for artificial insemination: an experience from low-resource settings in Nigeria.

Authors:  Euzebus Chinonye Ezugwu; George U Eleje; Chukwuemeka A Iyoke; Sunday G Mba; Henry C Nnaji; Chukwunonso I Enechukwu; Peter O Nkwo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Using an introduction website to start a family: implications for users and health practitioners.

Authors:  Joyce Harper; Emily Jackson; Laura Spoelstra-Witjens; Dan Reisel
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2017-04-07

9.  Gay father surrogacy families: relationships with surrogates and egg donors and parental disclosure of children's origins.

Authors:  Lucy Blake; Nicola Carone; Jenna Slutsky; Elizabeth Raffanello; Anke A Ehrhardt; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications.

Authors:  J C Harper; K Aittomäki; P Borry; M C Cornel; G de Wert; W Dondorp; J Geraedts; L Gianaroli; K Ketterson; I Liebaers; K Lundin; H Mertes; M Morris; G Pennings; K Sermon; C Spits; S Soini; A P A van Montfoort; A Veiga; J R Vermeesch; S Viville; M Macek
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.