Literature DB >> 27071107

Dynamical network of residue-residue contacts reveals coupled allosteric effects in recognition, catalysis, and mutation.

Urmi Doshi1, Michael J Holliday2, Elan Z Eisenmesser2, Donald Hamelberg3.   

Abstract

Detailed understanding of how conformational dynamics orchestrates function in allosteric regulation of recognition and catalysis remains ambiguous. Here, we simulate CypA using multiple-microsecond-long atomistic molecular dynamics in explicit solvent and carry out NMR experiments. We analyze a large amount of time-dependent multidimensional data with a coarse-grained approach and map key dynamical features within individual macrostates by defining dynamics in terms of residue-residue contacts. The effects of substrate binding are observed to be largely sensed at a location over 15 Å from the active site, implying its importance in allostery. Using NMR experiments, we confirm that a dynamic cluster of residues in this distal region is directly coupled to the active site. Furthermore, the dynamical network of interresidue contacts is found to be coupled and temporally dispersed, ranging over 4 to 5 orders of magnitude. Finally, using network centrality measures we demonstrate the changes in the communication network, connectivity, and influence of CypA residues upon substrate binding, mutation, and during catalysis. We identify key residues that potentially act as a bottleneck in the communication flow through the distinct regions in CypA and, therefore, as targets for future mutational studies. Mapping these dynamical features and the coupling of dynamics to function has crucial ramifications in understanding allosteric regulation in enzymes and proteins, in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclophilin A; allostery; enzyme dynamics; molecular dynamics; residue–residue contacts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27071107      PMCID: PMC4855540          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1523573113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

1.  Enzyme millisecond conformational dynamics do not catalyze the chemical step.

Authors:  Andrei V Pisliakov; Jie Cao; Shina C L Kamerlin; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reoptimization of the AMBER force field parameters for peptide bond (Omega) torsions using accelerated molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Urmi Doshi; Donald Hamelberg
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 3.  Experimental and computational determination of tRNA dynamics.

Authors:  Rebecca W Alexander; John Eargle; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Catalysis by dihydrofolate reductase and other enzymes arises from electrostatic preorganization, not conformational motions.

Authors:  Andrew J Adamczyk; Jie Cao; Shina C L Kamerlin; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  An introduction to NMR-based approaches for measuring protein dynamics.

Authors:  Ian R Kleckner; Mark P Foster
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-11-06

6.  A dynamic knockout reveals that conformational fluctuations influence the chemical step of enzyme catalysis.

Authors:  Gira Bhabha; Jeeyeon Lee; Damian C Ekiert; Jongsik Gam; Ian A Wilson; H Jane Dyson; Stephen J Benkovic; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB.

Authors:  James A Maier; Carmenza Martinez; Koushik Kasavajhala; Lauren Wickstrom; Kevin E Hauser; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Multiscale characterization of protein conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Amarda Shehu; Lydia E Kavraki; Cecilia Clementi
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-09

Review 9.  At the dawn of the 21st century: Is dynamics the missing link for understanding enzyme catalysis?

Authors:  Shina C L Kamerlin; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-05-01

10.  Characterizing and controlling the inherent dynamics of cyclophilin-A.

Authors:  Jennifer Schlegel; Geoffrey S Armstrong; Jasmina S Redzic; Fengli Zhang; Elan Zohar Eisenmesser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  49 in total

1.  Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function.

Authors:  Michael Joseph Holliday; Carlo Camilloni; Geoffrey Stuart Armstrong; Michele Vendruscolo; Elan Zohar Eisenmesser
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Eigenvector centrality for characterization of protein allosteric pathways.

Authors:  Christian F A Negre; Uriel N Morzan; Heidi P Hendrickson; Rhitankar Pal; George P Lisi; J Patrick Loria; Ivan Rivalta; Junming Ho; Victor S Batista
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The PyInteraph Workflow for the Study of Interaction Networks From Protein Structural Ensembles.

Authors:  Matteo Lambrughi; Valentina Sora; Matteo Tiberti
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Distinct dynamics and interaction patterns in H- and K-Ras oncogenic P-loop mutants.

Authors:  Abdallah Sayyed-Ahmad; Priyanka Prakash; Alemayehu A Gorfe
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-05-31

5.  Exploring Allosteric Pathways of a V-Type Enzyme with Dynamical Perturbation Networks.

Authors:  Aria Gheeraert; Lorenza Pacini; Victor S Batista; Laurent Vuillon; Claire Lesieur; Ivan Rivalta
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Chromosome Conformation Capture and Beyond: Toward an Integrative View of Chromosome Structure and Function.

Authors:  Rachel Patton McCord; Noam Kaplan; Luca Giorgetti
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  NMR and computational methods for molecular resolution of allosteric pathways in enzyme complexes.

Authors:  Kyle W East; Erin Skeens; Jennifer Y Cui; Helen B Belato; Brandon Mitchell; Rohaine Hsu; Victor S Batista; Giulia Palermo; George P Lisi
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2019-12-14

Review 8.  Engineered control of enzyme structural dynamics and function.

Authors:  David D Boehr; Rebecca N D'Amico; Kathleen F O'Rourke
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  The spliceosomal proteins PPIH and PRPF4 exhibit bi-partite binding.

Authors:  Caroline Rajiv; S RaElle Jackson; Simon Cocklin; Elan Z Eisenmesser; Tara L Davis
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 10.  Recent advances suggest increased influence of selective pressure in allostery.

Authors:  Archana S Bhat; Richard Dustin Schaeffer; Lisa Kinch; Kirill E Medvedev; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.