| Literature DB >> 27069614 |
Gadi V P Reddy1, Peijian Shi2, Cang Hui3, Xiaofei Cheng2, Fang Ouyang4, Feng Ge4.
Abstract
Knowing how climate change affects the population dynamics of insect pests is critical for the future of integrated pest management. Rising winter temperatures from global warming can drive increases in outbreaks of some agricultural pests. In contrast, here we propose an alternative hypothesis that both extremely cold and warm winters can mismatch the timing between the eclosion of overwintering pests and the flowering of key host plants. As host plants normally need higher effective cumulative temperatures for flowering than insects need for eclosion, changes in flowering time will be less dramatic than changes in eclosion time, leading to a mismatch of phenology on either side of the optimal winter temperature. We term this the "seesaw effect." Using a long-term dataset of the Old World cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in northern China, we tested this seesaw hypothesis by running a generalized additive model for the effects of the third generation moth in the preceding year, the winter air temperature, the number of winter days below a critical temperature and cumulative precipitation during winter on the demography of the overwintering moth. Results confirmed the existence of the seesaw effect of winter temperature change on overwintering populations. Pest management should therefore consider the indirect effect of changing crop phenology (whether due to greenhouse cultivation or to climate change) on pest outbreaks. As arthropods from mid- and high latitudes are actually living in a cooler thermal environment than their physiological optimum in contrast to species from lower latitudes, the effects of rising winter temperatures on the population dynamics of arthropods in the different latitudinal zones should be considered separately. The seesaw effect makes it more difficult to predict the average long-term population dynamics of insect pests at high latitudes due to the potential sharp changes in annual growth rates from fluctuating minimum winter temperatures.Entities:
Keywords: Global warming; Helicoverpa armigera; mismatched phenology; pest outbreaks; seesaw effect
Year: 2015 PMID: 27069614 PMCID: PMC4813116 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1The first generation larvae of feeding on wheat.
Figure 2Comparison of population dynamics of the third generation moth of of the preceding year and the overwintering generation moth in Raoyao County, in northern China.
Figure 3Conceptual diagram of the hypothesis of phenological mismatch between wheat flowering and pupal eclosion as driven by extreme cold or warm winter temperatures.
Figure 4Trends in minimum winter temperature over time in Raoyang County in northern China, where small open circles represent observed MWT, the bold straight line represents the fitted values of MWT based on the linear regression, and the red curve represents the predicted values of MWT based on the local regression.
Generalized additive model fit to the abundance of the overwintering generation of using four predictive variables
| Item | df |
|
|
| Variance explained |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s( | 2.444 | 5.421 | 0.010 | 0.543 | 75% |
| s( | 8.010 | 3.130 | 0.018 | ||
| s( | 7.019 | 1.917 | 0.120 | ||
| s( | 1.226 | 2.709 | 0.107 |
Here, s represents the smooth function, x 1 represents the abundance of the third generation of adult cotton bollworms of the last generation of the preceding year, x 2 represents minimum winter temperature, x 3 represents the number of days with the minimum daily air temperature ≤−12°C in winter, and x 4 represents the accumulated precipitation in winter.
Figure 5Generalized additive model predictions of the abundance of the overwintering generation of based on four variables. (A) Smooth and partial residuals of abundance of the third generation moth from the preceding year; (B) smooth and partial residuals of minimum winter temperature; (C) smooth and partial residuals of number of days with the minimum air temperature ≤−12°C in winter; (D) smooth and partial residuals of the accumulated precipitation in winter.
Generalized additive model fit to the abundance of the overwintering generation of , using three predictive variables, including minimum winter temperature
| Item | df |
|
|
| Variance explained |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s( | 5.763 | 6.696 | <0.01 | 0.689 | 86% |
| s( | 7.407 | 4.542 | <0.01 | ||
| s( | 8.699 | 3.391 | 0.015 |
Here, s represents the smooth function, x 1 represents the abundance of the third generation of cotton bollworms of the last generation of the preceding year, x 2 represents minimum winter temperature, and x 3 represents the number of days with the daily minimum air temperature ≤−12°C in winter.
Figure 6Adjusted coefficients of determination, for , calculated on different candidate critical temperatures, using (A) the minimum winter temperature or (B) winter average temperature, as a predictive variable.
Generalized additive model fit to the abundance of the overwintering generation of , using three predictive variables, including winter average temperature
| Item | df |
|
|
| Variance explained |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s( | 8.907 | 9.036 | <0.01 | 0.785 | 92% |
| s( | 7.413 | 3.355 | 0.0244 | ||
| s( | 8.099 | 5.056 | 0.0035 |
Here, s represents the smooth function, x 1 represents the abundance of the third‐generation moth of the preceding year, x 4 represents winter average temperature, and x 5 represents the number of days with the lowest daily air temperature ≤−11°C in winter.