Literature DB >> 25925104

A hybrid behavioural rule of adaptation and drift explains the emergent architecture of antagonistic networks.

S Nuwagaba1, F Zhang1, C Hui2.   

Abstract

Ecological processes that can realistically account for network architectures are central to our understanding of how species assemble and function in ecosystems. Consumer species are constantly selecting and adjusting which resource species are to be exploited in an antagonistic network. Here we incorporate a hybrid behavioural rule of adaptive interaction switching and random drift into a bipartite network model. Predictions are insensitive to the model parameters and the initial network structures, and agree extremely well with the observed levels of modularity, nestedness and node-degree distributions for 61 real networks. Evolutionary and community assemblage histories only indirectly affect network structure by defining the size and complexity of ecological networks, whereas adaptive interaction switching and random drift carve out the details of network architecture at the faster ecological time scale. The hybrid behavioural rule of both adaptation and drift could well be the key processes for structure emergence in real ecological networks.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  adaptive behaviour; functional response; modularity; nestedness; node degree; optimal foraging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25925104      PMCID: PMC4424652          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Jordi Bascompte; Pedro Jordano; Carlos J Melián; Jens M Olesen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Origin of compartmentalization in food webs.

Authors:  R Guimerà; D B Stouffer; M Sales-Pardo; E A Leicht; M E J Newman; L A N Amaral
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions.

Authors:  Jane Memmott; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Random initial condition in small Barabasi-Albert networks and deviations from the scale-free behavior.

Authors:  Paulo R Guimarães; Marcus A M de Aguiar; Jordi Bascompte; Pedro Jordano; Sérgio Furtado dos Reis
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-03-18

5.  Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance.

Authors:  Jordi Bascompte; Pedro Jordano; Jens M Olesen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Foraging biology predicts food web complexity.

Authors:  Andrew P Beckerman; Owen L Petchey; Philip H Warren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity.

Authors:  Ugo Bastolla; Miguel A Fortuna; Alberto Pascual-García; Antonio Ferrera; Bartolo Luque; Jordi Bascompte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour.

Authors:  Christopher N Kaiser-Bunbury; Stefanie Muff; Jane Memmott; Christine B Müller; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Zeta diversity as a concept and metric that unifies incidence-based biodiversity patterns.

Authors:  Cang Hui; Melodie A McGeoch
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Coevolution and the architecture of mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Scott L Nuismer; Pedro Jordano; Jordi Bascompte
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  7 in total

1.  Eco-evolutionary feedbacks promote fluctuating selection and long-term stability of antagonistic networks.

Authors:  Cecilia Siliansky de Andreazzi; Paulo R Guimarães; Carlos J Melián
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Seeing is believing? Comparing plant-herbivore networks constructed by field co-occurrence and DNA barcoding methods for gaining insights into network structures.

Authors:  Chunchao Zhu; Dominique Gravel; Fangliang He
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Integrating the underlying structure of stochasticity into community ecology.

Authors:  Lauren G Shoemaker; Lauren L Sullivan; Ian Donohue; Juliano S Cabral; Ryan J Williams; Margaret M Mayfield; Jonathan M Chase; Chengjin Chu; W Stanley Harpole; Andreas Huth; Janneke HilleRisLambers; Aubrie R M James; Nathan J B Kraft; Felix May; Ranjan Muthukrishnan; Sean Satterlee; Franziska Taubert; Xugao Wang; Thorsten Wiegand; Qiang Yang; Karen C Abbott
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Solar park promoted microbial nitrogen and phosphorus cycle potentials but reduced soil prokaryotic diversity and network stability in alpine desert ecosystem.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Chengxiang Ding; Derong Su; Tiemei Wang; Tao Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  The seesaw effect of winter temperature change on the recruitment of cotton bollworms Helicoverpa armigera through mismatched phenology.

Authors:  Gadi V P Reddy; Peijian Shi; Cang Hui; Xiaofei Cheng; Fang Ouyang; Feng Ge
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Invading a mutualistic network: to be or not to be similar.

Authors:  Henintsoa Onivola Minoarivelo; Cang Hui
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Robustness of rigid and adaptive networks to species loss.

Authors:  Savannah Nuwagaba; Feng Zhang; Cang Hui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.