| Literature DB >> 25535553 |
Fang Ouyang1, Cang Hui2, Saiying Ge3, Xin-Yuan Men4, Zi-Hua Zhao5, Pei-Jian Shi6, Yong-Sheng Zhang7, Bai-Lian Li8.
Abstract
Understanding drivers of population fluctuation, especially for agricultural pests, is central to the provision of agro-ecosystem services. Here, we examine the role of endogenous density dependence and exogenous factors of climate and human activity in regulating the 37-year population dynamics of an important agricultural insect pest, the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera), in North China from 1975 to 2011. Quantitative time-series analysis provided strong evidence explaining long-term population dynamics of the cotton bollworm and its driving factors. Rising temperature and declining rainfall exacerbated the effect of agricultural intensification on continuously weakening the negative density dependence in regulating the population dynamics of cotton bollworms. Consequently, ongoing climate change and agricultural intensification unleashed the tightly regulated pest population and triggered the regional outbreak of H. armigera in 1992. Although the negative density dependence can effectively regulate the population change rate to fluctuate around zero at stable equilibrium levels before and after outbreak in the 1992, the population equilibrium jumped to a higher density level with apparently larger amplitudes after the outbreak. The results highlight the possibility for exogenous factors to induce pest outbreaks and alter the population regulating mechanism of negative density dependence and, thus, the stable equilibrium of the pest population, often to a higher level, posing considerable risks to the provision of agro-ecosystem services and regional food security. Efficient and timely measures of pest management in the era of Anthropocene should target the strengthening and revival of weakening density dependence caused by climate change and human activities.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; density dependence; human activity; population dynamic; time series; variation partitioning
Year: 2014 PMID: 25535553 PMCID: PMC4228611 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1The study region and the lifecycle of the cotton bollworm. (A) Maps of land use in northern China (left) and in Raoyang County (right). The monitoring site was set in Baichi Village. (B) The four generations of the cotton bollworm and four distinct seasons in the region.
Figure 2The dynamics of population abundance and population change rate (R-function) for the cotton bollworm. (A) The annual and (B) generational dynamics of population abundance of cotton bollworms from 1975 to 2011. (C) The annual and (D) generational population change rate (R-function) of cotton bollworms. (E) The population change rate (R-function) for the overwintering, first, second, and third generations.
Figure 3Main effects of endogenous and exogenous factors on the population change rate of annual and four generations of adult cotton bollworms from the generalized additive models. Shade indicates the 95% confidence band; ns, non significant effect. Partial effects of density in last a year (A) and irrigation area (B) on the annual population change (R-function); partial effects of the third generation density in last year (C) and the precipitation during period of the overwinter generation (D) on the overwinter generation population change (R-function); partial effects of irrigation area (E) on the first generation population change (R-function); partial effects of the first generation density (F) and irrigation area (G) on the second generation population change (R-function). partial effects of the second generation density (H), the temperature during period of the third generation(I), and the precipitation during period of the third generation (J) on the third generation population change (R-function).
The effects of density dependence, temperature, precipitation, and irrigation on annual and generational population change rate of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, according to the generalized additive models.
| Population change rate | Density dependence | Temperature | Precipitation | Irrigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual population | – | ns | ns | + |
| Overwinter generation | − | ns | − | ns |
| First generation | ns | ns | ns | + |
| Second generation | – | ns | ns | ++ |
| Third generation | – | +++ | + | ns |
+/− indicates positive/negative effects; number of signs (from one to three) indicates the significance level at P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001; ns: not significant.
Figure 4Significant interactions between endogenous and exogenous factors on population change rate of cotton bollworms from the tensor product smoothing method (left panel) and the moving-window method (right panel). The linear regression on the right panel is based on a 12-year moving-window analysis (A–F, see Methods; solid dots, P < 0.05; circles, P ≥ 0.05). The interactive effects of density in the whole last year (X) and irrigation area (Irrigation) on the annual population change (R-function) (A); the interactive effects of the third generation density in last year (X) and the precipitation during period of the overwinter generation (Precipitation) on the overwinter generation population change (R-function) (B); the interactive effects of the first generation density (X) and irrigation area (Irrigation) on the second generation population change (R-function) (C); the interactive effects of the second generation density (X) and the temperature during period of the third generation (Temperature) on the third generation population change (R-function) (D); the interactive effects of the second generation density (X) and the precipitation during period of the third generation (Precipitation) on the third generation population change (R-function) (E); the interactive effects of the temperature (Temperature) and the precipitation during period of the third generation (Precipitation) on the third generation population change (R-function) (F), predicted from tensor product smooths respectively. Interactions among density dependence (DD), climate and irrigation. In the best-fit LM of the annual population only one explanatory variable (density) was a statistically significant term (at P < 0.05), then the result from the moving windows was not given (G–K); strength of DD for the overwinter generation and the precipitation during period of the overwinter generation (Precipitation) (G); strength of DD for the second generation and irrigation area (Irrigation) (H); strength of DD for the third generation and the temperature during period of the third generation (Temperature) (I); strength of DD for the third generation and the precipitation during period of the third generation (Precipitation) (J); the effects of the temperature (Temperature) on the third generation R-function and the precipitation (Precipitation) (K).
Variation partitioning of the population change rate according to three sets of variables into eight independent components: density dependence (Denci), climate (Clima, including temperature and precipitation), human activity (Irrig: irrigation area), interactions of variables.
| Explained variation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | All the year (%) | Overwinter (%) | First (%) | Second (%) | Third (%) |
| Denci | 20.12 | 16.80 | 0.00 | 37.00 | 25.30 |
| Clima | 0.06 | 17.16 | 7.46 | 0.00 | 19.55 |
| Irrig | 0.00 | 0.00 | 19.93 | 17.75 | 0.00 |
| Denci × Clima | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 4.10 |
| Clima × Irrig | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Denci × Irrig | 0.00 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9.25 |
| Denci × Clima × Irrig | 0.93 | 2.25 | 2.10 | 0.99 | 3.28 |
| Residuals | 78.82 | 62.67 | 72.60 | 44.65 | 41.80 |