Literature DB >> 16427489

Low female[corrected]-to-male [corrected] sex ratio of children born in India: national survey of 1.1 million households.

Prabhat Jha1, Rajesh Kumar, Priya Vasa, Neeraj Dhingra, Deva Thiruchelvam, Rahim Moineddin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fewer girls than boys are born in India. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain this low sex ratio. Our aim was to ascertain the contribution of prenatal sex determination and selective abortion as measured by previous birth sex.
METHODS: We analysed data obtained for the Special Fertility and Mortality Survey undertaken in 1998. Ever-married women living in 1.1 million households in 6671 nationally-representative units were asked questions about their fertility history and children born in 1997.
FINDINGS: For the 133 738 births studied for 1997, the adjusted sex ratio for the second birth when the preceding child was a girl was 759 per 1000 males (99% CI 731-787). The adjusted sex ratio for the third child was 719 (675-762) if the previous two children were girls. By contrast, adjusted sex ratios for second or third births if the previous children were boys were about equal (1102 and 1176, respectively). Mothers with grade 10 or higher education had a significantly lower adjusted sex ratio (683, 610-756) than did illiterate mothers (869, 820-917). Stillbirths and neonatal deaths were more commonly male, and the numbers of stillbirths were fewer than the numbers of missing births, suggesting that female infanticide does not account for the difference.
INTERPRETATION: Prenatal sex determination followed by selective abortion of female fetuses is the most plausible explanation for the low sex ratio at birth in India. Women most clearly at risk are those who already have one or two female children. Based on conservative assumptions, the practice accounts for about 0.5 million missing female births yearly, translating over the past 2 decades into the abortion of some 10 million female fetuses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16427489     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67930-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  74 in total

1.  Social and cultural factors associated with perinatal grief in Chhattisgarh, India.

Authors:  Lisa R Roberts; Susanne Montgomery; Jerry W Lee; Barbara A Anderson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

2.  Causes of neonatal and child mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey.

Authors:  Diego G Bassani; Rajesh Kumar; Shally Awasthi; Shaun K Morris; Vinod K Paul; Anita Shet; Usha Ram; Michelle F Gaffey; Robert E Black; Prabhat Jha
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Socioeconomic and geographical disparities in under-five and neonatal mortality in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Zoe Dettrick; Eliana Jimenez-Soto; Andrew Hodge
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

4.  Skewed sex ratios and criminal victimization in India.

Authors:  Scott J South; Katherine Trent; Sunita Bose
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2014-06

5.  Variations in male-female infant ratios among births to Canadian- and Indian-born mothers, 1990-2011: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Joel G Ray; Susitha Wanigaratne; Rahim Moineddin; Patricia J O'Campo
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  E Dahl; M Beutel; B Brosig; S Grüssner; Y Stöbel-Richter; H-R Tinneberg; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Sex selective feticide in India.

Authors:  Swapan Seth
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Trivers-Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983-2001.

Authors:  Douglas Almond; Lena Edlund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sex ratio patterns according to Asian ethnicity in Québec, 1981-2004.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Mark Daniel; Spencer Moore
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Gender bias in utilization of health services in Chandigarh.

Authors:  Abhijeet Saha; Veena Parmar; Deepak Chawala; Dinesh Walia
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.