Literature DB >> 31090594

Safety of Long-Term Storage and Shipping of Prestripped, Prestained, and Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue.

Jason Hooton1, Kyeong Hwan Kim1, Stephen I Lentz2, Nicholas Hicks3, Kayla Jones3, Kristen McCoy3, Shahzad I Mian1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of long-term storage and shipping of prestripped, prestained, and preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (pDMEK) grafts.
METHODS: A total of 33 cadaveric corneas were prestripped, prestained, and preloaded using modified Jones tube injectors as pDMEK. The corneas were masked to groups that were prepared <9 hours (control), 48 hours, and 72 hours before unloading and analysis. The 48- and 72-hour tissues were shipped by airfreight on each day before arrival to simulate domestic and international shipping. The corneas were then stained using Calcein AM vital dye (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and imaged using an inverted confocal microscope. Primary outcome measures were endothelial cell loss (ECL, %) and sustainability of staining. MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA) was used to quantify ECL, and staining was evaluated subjectively using all-or-none rating.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean ECL for the control, 48-hour, and 72-hour groups, which were 25.1% ± 8.8%, 26.4% ± 17.5%, and 19.2% ± 11.5%, respectively (P = 0.45; Kruskal-Wallis test). In all tissues of each group, no loss of staining was identified at each time point of analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: ECL in pDMEK tissue prepared 48 and 72 hours in advance and shipped using standard methods is similar to that in pDMEK tissue prepared on the same day. These findings support the safety of domestic and international shipping of pDMEK grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31090594      PMCID: PMC7315383          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  26 in total

Review 1.  Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Outcome Parameters Comparing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Ivana Pavlovic; Mehdi Shajari; Eva Herrmann; Ingo Schmack; Anna Lencova; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Prestripped, Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

Authors:  Khoa D Tran; Philip K Dye; Kelly Odell; Joshua Galloway; Christopher G Stoeger; Michael D Straiko; Mark A Terry
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Replacing the endothelium without corneal surface incisions or sutures: the first United States clinical series using the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Paula J Ousley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Standardizing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Method in the Eye Bank-Experience of 527 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissues.

Authors:  Mohit Parekh; Mattia Baruzzo; Elisa Favaro; Davide Borroni; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Alessandro Ruzza
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Frederico P Guerra; Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Arthur W Giebel; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Preloaded Tissues for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Stefano Ferrari; Massimo Busin; Diego Ponzin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking.

Authors:  Philippe Gain; Rémy Jullienne; Zhiguo He; Mansour Aldossary; Sophie Acquart; Fabrice Cognasse; Gilles Thuret
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

Authors:  Meraf A Wolle; David L DeMill; Lauren Johnson; Stephen I Lentz; Maria A Woodward; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Effect of donor preparation-to-use times on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew T Feng; Zachary N Burkhart; Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Comparison of preservation and transportation protocols for preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Colin E Willoughby; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  1 in total

1.  Viability of preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts with 96-hour shipment.

Authors:  Conan Chen; Steven Jared Solar; John Lohmeier; Staci Terrin; Satya Baliga; Batya Gold Wiener; Daniel Schouten Lewis; Eric Chiang; Kali Alexandra Barnes; Akash Chaurasia; Allen O Eghrari
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.