Literature DB >> 27064720

The Action Research Program: Experiential Learning in Systems-Based Practice for First-Year Medical Students.

Sara L Ackerman1, Christy Boscardin2, Leah Karliner2, Margaret A Handley3, Sarah Cheng4, Thomas W Gaither4, Jill Hagey4, Lauren Hennein4, Faizan Malik4, Brian Shaw4, Norver Trinidad4, Greg Zahner4, Ralph Gonzales5.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: Systems-based practice focuses on the organization, financing, and delivery of medical services. The American Association of Medical Colleges has recommended that systems-based practice be incorporated into medical schools' curricula. However, experiential learning in systems-based practice, including practical strategies to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical care, is often absent from or inconsistently included in medical education. INTERVENTION: A multidisciplinary clinician and nonclinician faculty team partnered with a cardiology outpatient clinic to design a 9-month clerkship for 1st-year medical students focused on systems-based practice, delivery of clinical care, and strategies to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical operations. The clerkship was called the Action Research Program. In 2013-2014, 8 trainees participated in educational seminars, research activities, and 9-week clinic rotations. A qualitative process and outcome evaluation drew on interviews with students, clinic staff, and supervising physicians, as well as students' detailed field notes. CONTEXT: The Action Research Program was developed and implemented at the University of California, San Francisco, an academic medical center in the United States. All educational activities took place at the university's medical school and at the medical center's cardiology outpatient clinic. OUTCOME: Students reported and demonstrated increased understanding of how care delivery systems work, improved clinical skills, growing confidence in interactions with patients, and appreciation for patients' experiences. Clinicians reported increased efficiency at the clinic level and improved performance and job satisfaction among medical assistants as a result of their unprecedented mentoring role with students. Some clinicians felt burdened when students shadowed them and asked questions during interactions with patients. Most student-led improvement projects were not fully implemented. LESSONS LEARNED: The Action Research Program is a small pilot project that demonstrates an innovative pairing of experiential and didactic training in systems-based practice. Lessons learned include the need for dedicated time and faculty support for students' improvement projects, which were the least successful aspect of the program. We recommend that future projects aiming to combine clinical training and quality improvement projects designate distinct blocks of time for trainees to pursue each of these activities independently. In 2014-2015, the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine incorporated key features of the Action Research Program into the standard curriculum, with plans to build upon this foundation in future curricular innovations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical education; implementation science; quality improvement; systems-based practice

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27064720      PMCID: PMC4916837          DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  11 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Evaluation of competency: an ACGME perspective. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  D C Leach
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 3.  A framework for teaching medical students and residents about practice-based learning and improvement, synthesized from a literature review.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; Linda A Headrick; Sunita Mutha; Mary T Coleman; Joseph O'Donnell; Paul V Miles
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Practicing effectively in today's health system: teaching systems-based care.

Authors:  Marc L Rivo; Dean R Keller; Arianne Teherani; Mark T O'Connell; Bruce A Weiss; Simeon A Rubenstein
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Student-run health clinic: novel arena to educate medical students on systems-based practice.

Authors:  Yasmin S Meah; Eric L Smith; David C Thomas
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2009-08

7.  A framework for training health professionals in implementation and dissemination science.

Authors:  Ralph Gonzales; Margaret A Handley; Sara Ackerman; Patricia S Oʼsullivan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  A multidisciplinary approach for teaching systems-based practice to internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Christopher Nabors; Stephen J Peterson; Roger Weems; Leanne Forman; Arif Mumtaz; Randy Goldberg; Kausik Kar; Joseph A Borges; Ida Doctor; Orpha Lubben; Nisha Pherwani; William H Frishman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

9.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  "The mirror" and "the village": a new method for teaching practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice.

Authors:  Roy C Ziegelstein; Nicholas H Fiebach
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  3 in total

1.  Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Marta Gil-Lacruz; María Luisa Gracia-Pérez; Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Developing implementation research capacity: longitudinal evaluation of the King's College London Implementation Science Masterclass, 2014-2019.

Authors:  Rachel Davis; Brian Mittman; Madelene Boyton; Aoife Keohane; Lucy Goulding; Jane Sandall; Graham Thornicroft; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2020-09-11

3.  Medical Students and Patients Benefit from Virtual Non-Medical Interactions Due to COVID-19.

Authors:  Taylor M Coe; Trevor J McBroom; Sarah A Brownlee; Karen Regan; Stephen Bartels; Noelle Saillant; Heidi Yeh; Emil Petrusa; Leigh Anne Dageforde
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2021-07-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.