| Literature DB >> 27063570 |
Mingming Wu1, Caihong Wei2, Zhengxing Lian1, Ruizao Liu2, Caiye Zhu2, Huihua Wang2, Jiaxue Cao2, Yuelei Shen3, Fuping Zhao2, Li Zhang2, Zhu Mu4, Yayu Wang4, Xiaogang Wang4, Lixin Du2, Chuduan Wang1.
Abstract
Recent advances in our ability to design DNA binding factors with specificity for desired sequences have resulted in a revolution in genetic engineering, enabling directed changes to the genome to be made relatively easily. Technologies that facilitate specific and precise genome editing, such as knock-in, are critical for determining the functions of genes and for understanding fundamental biological processes. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has recently emerged as a powerful tool for functional genomic studies in mammals. Rosa26 gene can encode a non-essential nuclear RNA in almost all organizations, and become a hot point of exogenous gene insertion. Here, we describe efficient, precise CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Integration using a donor vector with tGFP sequence targeted in the sheep genomic Rosa26 locus. We succeeded in integrating with high efficiency an exogenous tGFP (turboGFP) gene into targeted genes in frame. Due to its simplicity, design flexibility, and high efficiency, we propose that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in will become a standard method for the generation transgenic sheep.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27063570 PMCID: PMC4827023 DOI: 10.1038/srep24360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of sRosa26 and highly efficient gene knock-in and replacement at the sRosa26 locus.
(a,b) sRosa26 was expressed in a variety of organ tissues as determined by (a) RT-PCR and (b) quantitative RT-PCR. For RT-PCR, the designed primers annealed in sRosa26 sequence and amplified a correctly spliced product of 485 bp. Ovis GAPDH served as a control (234 bp). For qPCR, primers were specific to the sRosa26 sequence. The PCR product of the Ovis ACTB gene served as the reference control. Data are presented as the average expression levels of three individual RT/qPCR reactions.
Figure 2(a) Analysis of sgRNA activity. 5 guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed to target the sequence of the sRosa26 locus. All 5 sgRNAs efficiently guided Cas9 for genome editing.
5 different sgRNA designations.
| sgRNA | Sequence (5′–3′) | Target sequence length | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sROSA26-sgRNA1 | target sequence | ggaggcgatgacgagatcgc | 20 + PAM |
| sROSA26-sgRNA1-Up | cacc ggaggcgatgacgagatcgc | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA1-Dn | aaac gcgatctcgtcatcgcctcc | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA2 | target sequence | ggggagggagggattcttct | 20 + PAM |
| sROSA26-sgRNA2-Up | cacc ggggagggagggattcttct | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA2-Dn | aaac agaagaatccctccctcccc | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA3 | target sequence | gacgagatcgcgggggaggg | 20 + PAM |
| sROSA26-sgRNA3-Up | cacc ggacgagatcgcgggggaggg | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA3-Dn | aaac ccctcccccgcgatctcgtcc | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA4 | target sequence | gaggcgatgacgagatcgcg | 20 + PAM |
| sROSA26-sgRNA4-Up | cacc ggaggcgatgacgagatcgcg | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA4-Dn | aaac cgcgatctcgtcatcgcctcc | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA5 | target sequence | gtcgagtctctcctcgatta | 20 + PAM |
| sROSA26-sgRNA5-Up | cacc ggtcgagtctctcctcgatta | ||
| sROSA26-sgRNA5-Dn | aaac taatcgaggagagactcgacc |
5 guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed to target the sequence of the sRosa26 locus. The activity of the CRISPR/Cas9 was assessed using a UCA kit. All 5 sgRNAs efficiently guided Cas9 for genome editing.
Figure 3(a) Diagram of Cas9-mediated knock-in of LA-CAG-tGFP-polyA-RA into the sRosa26 locus. LA, left arm (1.0 kb); RA, right arm (1.0 kb). (b) CAG promoter-driven tGFP expression in sheep fibroblasts (CAG promoter region is shown in supplementary information).
Figure 4(a) PCR analysis of tGFP in tissues knock-in lambs. M = marker, N = negative control, P = postive control The size of target band is about 650 bp. (b) Southern blot analysis of tGFP–KI mutant sheep, Both the negative control and tGFP-KI sheep can be detected the target sequence. (c) RT- PCR analysis of tGFP expression in tissues knock-in lambs. All the lambs were 1 month old. tGFP gene expression quantity is 4.5 times that of the negative control. (d) Western blot analysis of tGFP–KI mutant sheep. Total protein from tGFP-KI sheep was subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 12% acrylamide gel. GADPH was used as a loading control. The tGFP gene expression cann’t be detected in controls.
Numbers of injected and transferred embryos, newborns, and mutants generated during the establishment of knock-in sheep using gRNA/Cas9 system.
| Gene | Number of embryos injected | Number of embryos transferred | Number of new borns | Number of mutations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sRosa26 | 35 | 30 | 8 | 1 |
| Ration | / | 85.7% | 26.7% | 12.5% |
Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA were mixed and injected into sheep zygotes. The injected eggs were transferred into pseudopregnant females. The mutations were identified by sequencing PCR amplified 0.5 kbp genomic fragment containing target in the center. GMO; gene modified organism.