| Literature DB >> 29563188 |
Mengjing Li1, Hongsheng Ouyang1, Hongming Yuan1, Jianing Li1, Zicong Xie1, Kankan Wang1, Tingting Yu1, Minghao Liu1, Xue Chen1, Xiaochun Tang1, Huping Jiao1, Daxin Pang2.
Abstract
The <span class="Gene">fat-1 gene from <span class="Species">Caenorhabditis elegans encodes a fatty acid desaturase which was widely studied due to its beneficial function of converting n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-6PUFAs) to n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3PUFAs). To date, many fat-1 transgenic animals have been generated to study disease pathogenesis or improve meat quality. However, all of them were generated using a random integration method with variable transgene expression levels and the introduction of selectable marker genes often raise biosafety concern. To this end, we aimed to generate marker-free fat-1 transgenic pigs in a site-specific manner. The Rosa26 locus, first found in mouse embryonic stem cells, has become one of the most common sites for inserting transgenes due to its safe and ubiquitous expression. In our study, the fat-1 gene was inserted into porcine Rosa 26 (pRosa26) locus via Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) system. The Southern blot analysis of our knock-in pigs indicated a single copy of the fat-1 gene at the pRosa26 locus. Furthermore, this single-copy fat-1 gene supported satisfactory expression in a variety of tissues in F1 generation pigs. Importantly, the gas chromatography analysis indicated that these fat-1 knock-in pigs exhibited a significant increase in the level of n-3PUFAs, leading to an obvious decrease in the n-6PUFAs/n-3PUFAs ratio from 9.36 to 2.12 (***P < 0.0001). Altogether, our fat-1 knock-in pigs hold great promise for improving the nutritional value of pork and serving as an animal model to investigate therapeutic effects of n-3PUFAs on various diseases.Entities:
Keywords: fat-1; genome editing; omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; pig
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29563188 PMCID: PMC5940165 DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 2Site-specific fat-1 knock-in at the pRosa26 locus. (A) Schematic of the donor plasmid for the fat-1 insertion. 5′HA, 5′ homologous arm (0.5 kb); 3′HA, homologous arm (1.0 kb); (B) Strategy of Cas9-mediated knock-in of fat-1 into the pRosa26 locus; (C) PCR analysis of the PFF clones using primer pair 1F/1R. The 1F primer was designed in 5′ HA and the 1R primer designed in 3′ HA. M: D2000. WT: negative control. H2O: blank control. *: A hybrid band formed by knock-in band and wild-type band in the process of genomic PCR of heterozygous animals; (D) Sanger sequencing results of the PCR products in (C) ; (E) PCR analysis of the PFF clones using primer pair 2F/2R. The 2F primer was designed upstream of 5′ HA and the 2R primer was designed in the fat-1 CDS; (F) Sanger sequencing results of the PCR products in (E) ; The primer pair 1F/1R was used to identify the insertion of the fat-1 gene whereas the primer pair 2F/2R was used to identify the site-specific integration of fat-1; (G) RT-PCR was performed to confirm the transcription of the fat-1 gene in genetically positive clones using the 3F/3R primer (268bp) ; (H) The wild-type sequence is placed on the first line and the mutation sequence of single-cell clones were placed below. The PAM was marked in purple and the target site was marked in blue. −/− means wild-type allele and +/− means NHEJ occurred in one allele; (I) The HDR, NHEJ and non-specific integration ratio of 327 individual cell cones.
Figure 1Dual luciferase assays in PK-15 cells. (A) Schematic of the psiCheck-2-pig albumin UTR plasmid; (B) The relative luciferase expression between psiCheck-2-pig albumin UTR plasmid transfected cells and control psiCheck-2 plasmid transfected cells. N = 3, *** P < 0.0001.
Figure 3Generation and genotyping of cloned piglets. (A) The reconstructed embryos were cultured in vitro for approximately 6 days until the blastocyst stage; (B) Photo of site-specific fat-1 knock-in piglets at seven days after birth; (C, E) PCR analysis of fat-1 knock-in pigs using primer 1F/1R and primer 2F/2R respectively. *: A hybrid band formed by knock-in band and wild-type band in the process of genomic PCR of heterozygous animals; (D) RT-PCR analysis of fat-1 positive pigs using primer 3F/3R; (F) The Southern blot result of fat-1 knock-in pigs using the digoxigenin labled fat-1 specific probe.
Figure 4Transcriptional analysis of fat-1 gene and fatty acid analysis of muscle tissues of F1 generation. (A) Photo of F1 generation fat-1 knock-in piglets at ten days after birth; The F1 generation was the offspring of Songliao Black sow and Duroc boars. (B, C) PCR analysis of F1 generation using primer 1F/1R and primer 2F/2R. *: A hybrid band formed by knock-in band and wild-type band in the process of genomic PCR of heterozygous animals; (D) RT-PCR analysis of F1 generation using primer 3F/3R; (E) Transcriptional level analysis of fat-1 gene in a wide variety of tissues as determined by real-time PCR; (F) The n-6PUFAs/n-3PUFAs ratio of fat-1 knock-in pigs and wild-type pigs. There are seven F1 generations and three of them were fat-1 knock-in pigs. The three positive piglets and three littermate wild-type piglets were killed and muscle fatty acids were extracted to evaluate the n-6PUFAs/n-3PUFAs ratio. Values are denoted as the Mean± SEM, n = 3, *** P < 0.0001.
Quantification of PUFAs in fat-1 knock-in and wild-type pigs
| Fatty acids | Wild-type pigs | |
|---|---|---|
| n-6 PUFAs | ||
| C18:2(LA) | 4.719 ± 0.04711*** | 7.781 ± 0.002225 |
| C20:4(AA) | 3.374 ± 0.03778*** | 4.518 ± 0.01559 |
| Total n6 | 8.094 ± 0.01791*** | 12.30 ± 0.01623 |
| n-3 PUFAs | 0.4084 ± 0.005407*** | 0.2510 ± 0.002812 |
| C18:3(ALA) | 0.06893 ± 0.008027 | 0.08027 ± 0.00256 |
| C20:5(EPA) | 0.6380 ± 0.007916*** | 0.5159 ± 0.006721 |
| C22:6(DHA) | 2.693 ± 0.01361*** | 0.4692 ± 0.03188 |
| C22:5(DPA) | 3.817 ± 0.008717*** | 1.316 ± 0.03965 |
| Total n3 | 2.120 ± 0.00111*** | 9.360 ± 0.2790 |
| n-6/n-3 ratio |
Each fatty acid is presented as the percentage in total fatty acid. Values are denoted as the Mean± SEM, n = 3, *** P < 0.0001.