Naoko I Simonds1, Armen A Ghazarian2, Camilla B Pimentel3, Sheri D Schully4, Gary L Ellison1, Elizabeth M Gillanders1, Leah E Mechanic1. 1. Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America. 2. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America. 3. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America. 4. Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Risk of cancer is determined by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Although the study of gene-environment interactions (G×E) has been an active area of research, little is reported about the known findings in the literature. METHODS: To examine the state of the science in G×E research in cancer, we performed a systematic review of published literature using gene-environment or pharmacogenomic flags from two curated databases of genetic association studies, the Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) literature finder and Cancer Genome-Wide Association and Meta Analyses Database (CancerGAMAdb), from January 1, 2001, to January 31, 2011. A supplemental search using HuGE was conducted for articles published from February 1, 2011, to April 11, 2013. A 25% sample of the supplemental publications was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 3,019 articles were identified in the original search. From these articles, 243 articles were determined to be relevant based on inclusion criteria (more than 3,500 interactions). From the supplemental search (1,400 articles identified), 29 additional relevant articles (1,370 interactions) were included. The majority of publications in both searches examined G×E in colon, rectal, or colorectal; breast; or lung cancer. Specific interactions examined most frequently included environmental factors categorized as energy balance (e.g., body mass index, diet), exogenous (e.g., oral contraceptives) and endogenous hormones (e.g., menopausal status), chemical environment (e.g., grilled meats), and lifestyle (e.g., smoking, alcohol intake). In both searches, the majority of interactions examined were using loci from candidate genes studies and none of the studies were genome-wide interaction studies (GEWIS). The most commonly reported measure was the interaction P-value, of which a sizable number of P-values were considered statistically significant (i.e., <0.05). In addition, the magnitude of interactions reported was modest. CONCLUSION: Observations of published literature suggest that opportunity exists for increased sample size in G×E research, including GWAS-identified loci in G×E studies, exploring more GWAS approaches in G×E such as GEWIS, and improving the reporting of G×E findings. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND: Risk of cancer is determined by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Although the study of gene-environment interactions (G×E) has been an active area of research, little is reported about the known findings in the literature. METHODS: To examine the state of the science in G×E research in cancer, we performed a systematic review of published literature using gene-environment or pharmacogenomic flags from two curated databases of genetic association studies, the Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) literature finder and Cancer Genome-Wide Association and Meta Analyses Database (CancerGAMAdb), from January 1, 2001, to January 31, 2011. A supplemental search using HuGE was conducted for articles published from February 1, 2011, to April 11, 2013. A 25% sample of the supplemental publications was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 3,019 articles were identified in the original search. From these articles, 243 articles were determined to be relevant based on inclusion criteria (more than 3,500 interactions). From the supplemental search (1,400 articles identified), 29 additional relevant articles (1,370 interactions) were included. The majority of publications in both searches examined G×E in colon, rectal, or colorectal; breast; or lung cancer. Specific interactions examined most frequently included environmental factors categorized as energy balance (e.g., body mass index, diet), exogenous (e.g., oral contraceptives) and endogenous hormones (e.g., menopausal status), chemical environment (e.g., grilled meats), and lifestyle (e.g., smoking, alcohol intake). In both searches, the majority of interactions examined were using loci from candidate genes studies and none of the studies were genome-wide interaction studies (GEWIS). The most commonly reported measure was the interaction P-value, of which a sizable number of P-values were considered statistically significant (i.e., <0.05). In addition, the magnitude of interactions reported was modest. CONCLUSION: Observations of published literature suggest that opportunity exists for increased sample size in G×E research, including GWAS-identified loci in G×E studies, exploring more GWAS approaches in G×E such as GEWIS, and improving the reporting of G×E findings. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
candidate gene; gene-environment interaction; genome-wide association study (GWAS); literature review
Authors: Lucia A Hindorff; Praveen Sethupathy; Heather A Junkins; Erin M Ramos; Jayashri P Mehta; Francis S Collins; Teri A Manolio Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Karsten Suhre; Henri Wallaschofski; Johannes Raffler; Nele Friedrich; Robin Haring; Kathrin Michael; Christina Wasner; Alexander Krebs; Florian Kronenberg; David Chang; Christa Meisinger; H-Erich Wichmann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Henry Völzke; Uwe Völker; Alexander Teumer; Reiner Biffar; Thomas Kocher; Stephan B Felix; Thomas Illig; Heyo K Kroemer; Christian Gieger; Werner Römisch-Margl; Matthias Nauck Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-05-15 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Julian Little; Julian P T Higgins; John P A Ioannidis; David Moher; France Gagnon; Erik von Elm; Muin J Khoury; Barbara Cohen; George Davey-Smith; Jeremy Grimshaw; Paul Scheet; Marta Gwinn; Robin E Williamson; Guang Yong Zou; Kim Hutchings; Candice Y Johnson; Valerie Tait; Miriam Wiens; Jean Golding; Cornelia van Duijn; John McLaughlin; Andrew Paterson; George Wells; Isabel Fortier; Matthew Freedman; Maja Zecevic; Richard King; Claire Infante-Rivard; Alex Stewart; Nick Birkett Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Christine B Ambrosone; Silke Kropp; Jun Yang; Song Yao; Peter G Shields; Jenny Chang-Claude Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-01-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Cliona M McHale; Gwendolyn Osborne; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Andrew G Salmon; Martha S Sandy; Gina Solomon; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Lauren Zeise Journal: Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 5.657
Authors: Ariane Mbemi; Sunali Khanna; Sylvianne Njiki; Clement G Yedjou; Paul B Tchounwou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.390