| Literature DB >> 27058551 |
Arnaud Laillou1, Prak Sophonneary2, Khov Kuong3, Rathavuth Hong4, Samoeurn Un5, Chhoun Chamnan6, Etienne Poirot7, Jacques Berger8, Frank Wieringa9.
Abstract
A 2014 national assessment of salt iodization coverage in Cambodia found that 62% of samples were non-iodized, suggesting a significant decline in daily iodine intakes. The Cambodian Micronutrient Survey conducted in 2014 (CMNS-2014) permitted obtaining national data on urinary iodine concentrations (UIC) to assess iodine status and whether iodized salt use had an impact. Urine samples were collected from mothers (n = 736) and children (n = 950). The median UIC was 63 µg/L and 72 µg/L in mothers and children respectively. More than 60% of mothers and their children had a UIC < 100 µg/L, thereby indicating a serious public health problem. Iodine status was significantly lower among mothers and children living in rural areas, belonging to the poorest socioeconomic category, or living in a household not using iodized salt. The limited enforcement of the legislation for iodized salt has resulted in a major decrease in the prevalence of iodized salt, which in turn has compromised iodine status in Cambodia. It is essential for the government to enhance enforcement of the iodized salt legislation, and implement short term strategies, such as iodine supplementation, to prevent an increase of severe complications due to iodine deficiency in the Cambodian population.Entities:
Keywords: 2014; Cambodia; Demographic Health Survey; Iodine; national survey
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27058551 PMCID: PMC4848647 DOI: 10.3390/nu8040172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Bivariate relationships between median urinary iodine concentrations (UIC) and living area, wealth quintiles, access to iodized salt, and access to equity card among mothers.
| Urinary Iodine Concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (µg/L) | 25th–75th Percentile (µg/L) |
|
| |
|
| 63 | (33; 101) | 736 | - |
|
| ||||
| Urban | 78 | (45; 130) | 151 |
|
| Rural | 58 | (31; 93) | 585 | |
|
| ||||
| Poorest | 55 | (27; 90) | 315 |
|
| Middle | 56 | (31; 90) | 131 | |
| Richest | 75 | (43; 121) | 290 | |
|
| ||||
| Salt tested positive | 68 | (36; 110) | 554 |
|
| Salt tested negative | 49 | (21; 77) | 176 | |
|
| ||||
| Package labelled as iodized | 76 | (43; 119) | 250 |
|
| No labelling | 53 | (26; 89) | 334 | |
|
| ||||
| Equity card seen | 55 | (30; 93) | 142 |
|
| Equity card but not seen 2 | 73 | (39; 106) | 24 | |
| No equity card | 65 | (32; 102) | 570 | |
Note: 1 non parametric tests were performed as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the distribution is not normal. Therefore Mann-Whitney has been performed for 2 independent samples and Kruskal-wallis for k-independent samples; 2 the household claimed to have an equity card but didn’t show it the interviewer.
Bivariate relationships between the prevalence of iodine level in urine and living area, wealth quintile, access to iodized salt, and access to equity card among mothers.
| % | Prevalence of Iodine Level in Urine | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less 50 µg/L | 50–99 µg/L | 100–299 µg/L | ≥300 µg/L |
|
| |
|
| 40.2 | 34.4 | 23.9 | 1.5 | 736 | - |
|
| ||||||
| Urban | 28.5 | 32.5 | 37.7 | 1.3 | 151 |
|
| Rural | 43.1 | 34.9 | 20.3 | 1.7 | 585 | |
|
| ||||||
| Poorest | 44.8 | 34.6 | 17.8 | 2.8 | 315 |
|
| Middle | 48.1 | 29.8 | 21.4 | 0.7 | 131 | |
| Richest | 31.7 | 36.2 | 31.7 | 0.4 | 290 | |
|
| ||||||
| Salt tested positive | 37.0 | 34.3 | 27.1 | 1.6 | 554 |
|
| Salt tested negative | 51.1 | 34.1 | 13.6 | 1.2 | 176 | |
|
| ||||||
| Package labelled as iodized | 32.0 | 33.6 | 33.2 | 1.2 | 250 |
|
| No labelling | 47.9 | 32 | 18.3 | 1.8 | 334 | |
|
| ||||||
| Equity card | 42.8 | 32.5 | 22.3 | 2.4 | 166 |
|
| No equity card | 39.5 | 34.9 | 24.4 | 1.2 | 570 | |
Note: 1 non parametric tests were performed as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the distribution is not normal. Therefore Mann-Whitney has been performed for 2 independent samples and Kruskal-wallis for k-independent samples.
Bivariate relationships between median UIC and living area, wealth quintiles, age groups, access to iodized salt, and access to equity card among children under 5 years of age.
| Urinary Iodine Concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (µg/L) | 25th–75th Percentile (µg/L) |
|
| |
|
| 72 | (36; 136) | 950 | - |
|
| ||||
| Urban | 112 | (52; 172) | 201 |
|
| Rural | 64 | (33; 122) | 749 | |
|
| ||||
| Poorest | 51 | (27; 106) | 410 |
|
| Middle | 61 | (30; 110) | 175 | |
| Richest | 104 | (53; 167) | 365 | |
|
| ||||
| 6–11 months | 90 | (50; 179) | 90 |
|
| 12–23 months | 72 | (40; 139) | 156 | |
| 24–59 months | 72 | (34; 129) | 565 | |
| 60+ months | 55 | (34; 126) | 137 | |
|
| ||||
| Salt tested positive | 75 | (39; 141) | 725 |
|
| Salt tested negative | 62 | (30; 101) | 218 | |
|
| ||||
| Package labelled as iodized | 92 | (46; 162) | 309 |
|
| No labelling | 60 | (29; 117) | 431 | |
|
| ||||
| Equity card seen | 58 | (27; 116) | 197 | 0.007 |
| Equity card but not seen 2 | 71 | (37; 138) | 35 | |
| No equity card | 77 | (38; 140) | 718 | |
Note: 1 non parametric tests were performed as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the distribution is not normal. Therefore Mann-Whitney has been performed for 2 independent samples and Kruskal-wallis for k-independent samples; 2 the household claimed to have an equity card but didn’t show it the interviewer.
Bivariate relationships between the prevalence of iodine level in urine and living area, wealth quintile, access to iodized salt, age groups, and access to equity card among children under 5 years of age.
| % | Prevalence of Iodine Level in Urine | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less 50 µg/L | 50–99 µg/L | 100–299 µg/L | ≥300 µg/L |
|
| |
|
| 36.4 | 27.3 | 31.7 | 4.6 | 950 | - |
|
| ||||||
| Urban | 20.4 | 24.9 | 46.8 | 7.9 | 201 |
|
| Rural | 40.7 | 27.9 | 27.6 | 3.8 | 749 | |
|
| ||||||
| Poorest | 48.3 | 25.6 | 22.0 | 4.1 | 410 |
|
| Middle | 38.9 | 33.1 | 25.1 | 2.9 | 175 | |
| Richest | 21.9 | 26.3 | 45.8 | 6 | 365 | |
|
| ||||||
| 6–11 months | 24.4 | 28.9 | 35.6 | 11.1 | 90 |
|
| 12–23 months | 32.1 | 31.4 | 32.1 | 4.4 | 156 | |
| 24–59 months | 37.2 | 27.4 | 31.3 | 4.1 | 565 | |
| 60+ months | 46.7 | 21.2 | 29.1 | 3.0 | 137 | |
|
| ||||||
| Salt tested positive | 34.5 | 25.5 | 35.0 | 5.0 | 725 |
|
| Salt tested negative | 41.3 | 33.5 | 21.6 | 3.6 | 218 | |
|
| ||||||
| Package labelled as iodized | 27.2 | 26.2 | 40.1 | 6.5 | 309 |
|
| No labelling | 44.1 | 27.8 | 26.2 | 1.9 | 431 | |
|
| ||||||
| Equity card | 43.5 | 28.4 | 24.1 | 4.0 | 232 |
|
| No equity card | 34.1 | 26.9 | 34.1 | 4.9 | 718 | |
Note: 1 non parametric tests were performed as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the distribution is not normal. Therefore Mann-Whitney has been performed for 2 independent samples and Kruskal-wallis for k-independent samples.
Multivariate model analysis: binary logistic regression analysis for the risk factors associated with UIC below 100 µg/L (Variables in the model were selected through a backward stepwise conditional approach. Variables not significant in the model (p > 0.05) were excluded. The covariates used to build the model were: age for children only (<24 months, above or equal to 24 months); salt test at household (positive for iodine and not positive for iodine), access to equity card (yes and no), and packaging of salt at household (labelled as iodized and no labelling), living area (urban/rural), and wealth quintile (poor and rich). Results were considered significant at p < 0.05).
| Degrees of Freedom (DF) | Adjusted Odds | 95% Confident of Interval (CI) for Odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Rural area | 1 |
|
|
|
| Richest category | 1 |
|
|
|
| ≥24 months of age | 1 |
|
|
|
| Salt tested negative for iodine | 1 |
|
|
|
| Packaging not labelled as iodized | 1 |
|
|
|
| Access to equity card | 1 | 0.739 | 1.07 | 0.72–1.60 |
|
| ||||
| Rural area | 1 |
|
|
|
| Richest category | 1 | 0.195 | 0.74 | 0.47–1.17 |
| Salt tested negative for iodine | 1 |
|
|
|
| Packaging not labelled as iodized | 1 | 0.103 | 1.41 | 0.93–2.12 |
| Access to equity card | 1 | 0.357 | 1.26 | 0.77–2.04 |