Literature DB >> 27054791

The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.

Lindsay Turner1, Erin Lavelle, Jerry L Lowder, Jonathan P Shepherd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the risk of intraoperative complications and prolapse recurrence among normal-weight, overweight, and obese women after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexies performed at a large academic center from 2009 to 2014. Patient demographics and clinical and surgical data were compared between normal-weight, overweight, and obese women using χ test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 556 subjects, 187 (33.6%) were normal weight, 248 (44.6%) were overweight, and 121 (21.8%) were obese. Compared with normal-weight and overweight women, obese women had more medical comorbidities (56.2% vs 29.4% and 39.5%, P < 0.001) and were more likely to undergo robotic surgery (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.94). Obese women experienced greater blood loss compared with overweight women (82.4 [76.1] vs 63.8 [51.6] mL, P = 0.03) and longer operative times compared with both normal-weight and overweight women (250.7 [57.0] vs 233.8 [58.2] minutes, P = 0.04, and 250.7 [57.0] vs 233.8 [57.2] minutes, P = 0.03). Obesity was a significant predictor of intraoperative complications even after correcting for surgeon experience, estimated blood loss, and concomitant hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-9.70). Few women (7.6%) experienced recurrence of prolapse. Obesity was not a significant predictor of prolapse recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, obesity is associated with increased blood loss, longer operative times, and more intraoperative complications, specifically conversions to laparotomy. Even after correcting for blood loss, surgeon experience, and concomitant hysterectomy, obese women were 3 times as likely to have an intraoperative complication. Our data did not show that obesity was associated with increased risk of prolapse recurrence; however, postoperative follow-up was limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054791     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  9 in total

1.  Assessing pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: does mesh weight matter?

Authors:  Lauren E Giugale; Molly M Hansbarger; Amy L Askew; Anthony G Visco; Jonathan P Shepherd; Megan S Bradley
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talia Friedman; Guy D Eslick; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Obesity and its long-term impact on sacrocolpopexy key outcomes (OBELISK).

Authors:  Martin Smazinka; Vladimir Kalis; Martin Havir; Linda Havelkova; Khaled M Ismail; Zdenek Rusavy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Radhika Patnam; Katherine Husk; Abhishek Sripad; Kathryn Barletta; Alexis Dieter; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-04-16

6.  The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Charelle M Carter-Brooks; Angela L Du; Michael J Bonidie; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after apical prolapse repair: does obesity matter?

Authors:  Nina Durchfort Metcalfe; Lisa M Shandley; Marisa Rogers Young; Michelle Higgins; Chidimma Abanulo; Gina M Northington
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight.

Authors:  Charlotte Mahoney; Georgina Scott; Lucy Dwyer; Fiona Reid; Karen Ward; Anthony Smith; Rohna Kearney
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Giuseppe Campagna; Lorenzo Vacca; Giovanni Panico; Valerio Rumolo; Daniela Caramazza; Andrea Lombisani; Cristiano Rossitto; Pierre Gadonneix; Giovanni Scambia; Alfredo Ercoli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.894

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.