Literature DB >> 27053279

Pediatric interventional radiology clinic - how are we doing?

Jonathan Rubenstein1,2, Julie C Zettel1, Eric Lee1, Michelle Cote1, Albert Aziza1, Bairbre L Connolly3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of a pediatric interventional radiology clinic is a necessary component of providing a pediatric interventional radiology service. Patient satisfaction is important when providing efficient, high-quality care.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the care provided by a pediatric interventional radiology clinic from the perspective of efficiency and parent satisfaction, so as to identify areas for improvement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study was both quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative component measured clinic efficiency (waiting times, duration of clinic visit, nurse/physician time allocation and assessments performed; n = 91). The qualitative component assessed parental satisfaction with their experience with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic, using a questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and optional free text section for feedback (n = 80). Questions explored the family's perception of relevance of information provided, consent process and overall satisfaction with their pediatric interventional radiology clinic experience.
RESULTS: Families waited a mean of 11 and 10 min to meet the physician and nurse, respectively. Nurses and physicians spent a mean of 28 and 21 min with the families, respectively. The average duration of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic consultation was 56 min. Of 80 survey participants, 83% were satisfied with their experience and 94% said they believed providing consent before the day of the procedure was helpful. Only 5% of respondents were not satisfied with the time-efficiency of the interventional radiology clinic.
CONCLUSION: Results show the majority of patients/parents are very satisfied with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic visit. The efficiency of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic is satisfactory; however, adherence to stricter scheduling can be improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Clinic; Interventional radiology; Pediatric; Satisfaction; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27053279     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3593-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  17 in total

1.  The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.

Authors:  P D Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Hospital Outpatient Quality Data Reporting Program.

Authors:  N Anumula; P C Sanelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Karl N Krecke; Rafael Miranda; Catherine C Roberts; Charles Denham
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Incentives to increase patient satisfaction: are we doing more harm than good?

Authors:  Jay Detsky; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Telemedicine for the care of children in the hospital setting.

Authors:  S David McSwain; James P Marcin
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.132

Review 6.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  Predictors of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J L Jackson; J Chamberlin; K Kroenke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Adherence to medication regimens: updating a complex medical issue.

Authors:  M K O'Brien; K Petrie; J Raeburn
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1992

9.  The practice of pediatric interventional radiology.

Authors:  David J E Lord
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-03

10.  The interventional radiology clinic: key ingredients for success.

Authors:  Gary P Siskin; Sandeep Bagla; Gail E Sansivero; Nancy L Mitchell
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.